StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. CircleCI vs Laravel Forge

CircleCI vs Laravel Forge

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CircleCI
CircleCI
Stacks14.5K
Followers7.1K
Votes974
Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge
Stacks233
Followers273
Votes4

CircleCI vs Laravel Forge: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CircleCI and Laravel Forge

  1. Purpose: CircleCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform that automates the build, test, and deployment process of software applications, allowing teams to release code faster and more frequently. On the other hand, Laravel Forge is a service that simplifies the deployment and management of Laravel applications on cloud servers, making it easier for developers to host their projects without worrying about server configurations.

  2. Feature Set: While CircleCI focuses on build automation, testing, and deployment of applications across various platforms and environments, Laravel Forge is specifically designed for PHP developers working with Laravel framework, providing features like automated server provisioning, SSL certificate management, and seamless integration with cloud hosting providers.

  3. Scalability: CircleCI excels in scalability by supporting large teams and complex projects with advanced features like parallel testing and workflow orchestration, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. In contrast, Laravel Forge is more tailored towards smaller to medium-sized projects, offering simplicity and ease of use for developers looking for a straightforward deployment solution without complex configurations.

  4. Integration: CircleCI integrates seamlessly with popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, as well as various third-party tools for monitoring, code analysis, and notifications. Laravel Forge, on the other hand, mainly focuses on integration with Laravel applications and cloud hosting providers, providing a more specialized set of integrations tailored to PHP development and deployment workflows.

  5. Pricing Model: CircleCI offers a variety of pricing plans based on usage, providing flexibility for teams of different sizes and needs. In comparison, Laravel Forge follows a subscription-based pricing model with tiered plans based on the number of servers and additional features, making it more predictable for budgeting and cost management.

  6. Community Support: CircleCI has a large and active community of developers and contributors who share tips, best practices, and support resources, creating a robust ecosystem for continuous integration and delivery. While Laravel Forge also has a supportive community of Laravel developers, the focus is more on aiding users with specific issues related to Laravel deployment rather than general continuous integration practices.

In Summary, CircleCI and Laravel Forge cater to different aspects of the development and deployment process, with CircleCI offering comprehensive continuous integration and delivery capabilities, while Laravel Forge provides a simplified solution specifically tailored for Laravel applications and cloud server management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Laravel Forge

Dustin
Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

ReviewonCircleCICircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k
Comments
Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI
CircleCI
Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Provision, host, and deploy PHP applications on AWS, DigitalOcean, and Linode.

Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights
-
Statistics
Stacks
14.5K
Stacks
233
Followers
7.1K
Followers
273
Votes
974
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 226
    Github integration
  • 177
    Easy setup
  • 153
    Fast builds
  • 94
    Competitively priced
  • 74
    Slack integration
Cons
  • 12
    Unstable
  • 6
    Scammy pricing structure
  • 0
    Aggressive Github permissions
Pros
  • 4
    Simply to use
Cons
  • 2
    Monthly subscription
Integrations
dotCloud
dotCloud
GitHub
GitHub
Xcode
Xcode
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Slack
Slack
Heroku
Heroku
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Laravel Forge?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana