CircleCI vs Codefresh

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

Codefresh

Stacks64

Followers111

Votes47

CircleCI vs Codefresh: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will explore the key differences between CircleCI and Codefresh, two popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platforms.

Deployment Options: CircleCI supports both cloud and on-premises deployments, offering flexibility in choosing the hosting environment based on specific requirements. On the other hand, Codefresh is a cloud-based CI/CD platform, providing a scalable and managed infrastructure without the need for on-premises setup.
Pricing Structure: CircleCI offers a tiered pricing model based on the number of containers, allowing users to pay for what they need. Codefresh, on the other hand, offers a subscription-based pricing model that includes unlimited builds, which can be cost-effective for teams with a higher build volume.
Native Kubernetes Integration: Codefresh provides seamless integration with Kubernetes, allowing users to build, test, and deploy applications directly to Kubernetes clusters. While CircleCI also supports Kubernetes deployments, Codefresh's native integration offers a more streamlined and efficient workflow for Kubernetes-based projects.
Pipeline Configuration: CircleCI uses a YAML-based configuration file to define the build pipeline, providing a more explicit and granular control over the build process. Codefresh, on the other hand, offers a visually intuitive UI with a drag-and-drop interface to configure the pipeline, making it easier for non-technical users to create and manage CI/CD workflows.
Built-in Helm Chart Management: Codefresh provides built-in Helm chart management capabilities, allowing users to easily package and deploy applications using Helm charts. While CircleCI can also be integrated with Helm for deployment, Codefresh simplifies the process by providing native support and a user-friendly interface for managing Helm charts.
Community and Integration Ecosystem: CircleCI has a large community and integrations ecosystem, with a wide range of supported plugins and third-party integrations, offering extensive customization options. Codefresh, while also having a decent range of integrations, has a smaller community but focuses on providing a curated set of integrations and plugins with a strong emphasis on Kubernetes and Docker ecosystem.

In summary, CircleCI provides flexible deployment options, a tiered pricing structure, and an extensive plugins ecosystem, while Codefresh offers native Kubernetes integration, a subscription-based pricing model, and simplified pipeline configuration with Helm chart management. Choose CircleCI for broader customizations and deployment options, while Codefresh is a great fit for organizations using Kubernetes extensively.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Codefresh

Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

Reviewon

CircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	Codefresh
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Instant Dev, test and feature preview environments: Enables all team members to run any image as a standalone or composition for feature preview, manual testing, bug reproduction and more. Collaborate on features before pushing them into staging and production.; Testing with every step: Configure your pipeline to run integration and unit tests with every step; Instantly test all code changes in the Codefresh build system before pushing to staging & production. Run integration, unit tests in parallel.; 360° view of Docker images: View commit info, test results and build logs for all images; Manage Docker image labels and status, comment and see new feature branches; search and filter based on any attribute.; Out-of-the-box Docker buildpack for all technologies: Seamlessly package your code in a Docker image. Quickly associate a Dockerfile with your repo by selecting the repository technology stack (Java, Node, PHP, etc.). Codefresh then adds a template for Dockerizing apps.; View and Access Running Container Logs: Access each container log directly from within the Codefresh platform. This lets you easily perform root-cause analysis on failed services and allows you to see logs in high debug model level.; Support for Docker Compose 1 & 2: Manage your Docker Compose file natively in one place, with support for both Docker Compose versions 1 and 2. Use a built-in wizard to write Docker Compose files quickly.; YAML file support: Customize and easily define your pipeline steps using a codefresh.yml file.
Statistics
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 64
Followers 7.1K	Followers 111
Votes 974	Votes 47
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 11 Fastest and easiest way to work with Docker 7 Great support/fast builds/awesome ui 6 Great onboarding 5 Freestyle build steps to support custom CI/CD scripting 4 Easy setup Cons 1 Questionable product quality and stability 1 Expensive compared to alternatives
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	Quay.io Docker Compose Docker Swarm BinTray Docker Cloud Amazon EC2 GitHub Bitbucket HipChat BlazeMeter

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Codefresh?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

CircleCI vs Codefresh: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will explore the key differences between CircleCI and Codefresh, two popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platforms.

Deployment Options: CircleCI supports both cloud and on-premises deployments, offering flexibility in choosing the hosting environment based on specific requirements. On the other hand, Codefresh is a cloud-based CI/CD platform, providing a scalable and managed infrastructure without the need for on-premises setup.
Pricing Structure: CircleCI offers a tiered pricing model based on the number of containers, allowing users to pay for what they need. Codefresh, on the other hand, offers a subscription-based pricing model that includes unlimited builds, which can be cost-effective for teams with a higher build volume.
Native Kubernetes Integration: Codefresh provides seamless integration with Kubernetes, allowing users to build, test, and deploy applications directly to Kubernetes clusters. While CircleCI also supports Kubernetes deployments, Codefresh's native integration offers a more streamlined and efficient workflow for Kubernetes-based projects.
Pipeline Configuration: CircleCI uses a YAML-based configuration file to define the build pipeline, providing a more explicit and granular control over the build process. Codefresh, on the other hand, offers a visually intuitive UI with a drag-and-drop interface to configure the pipeline, making it easier for non-technical users to create and manage CI/CD workflows.
Built-in Helm Chart Management: Codefresh provides built-in Helm chart management capabilities, allowing users to easily package and deploy applications using Helm charts. While CircleCI can also be integrated with Helm for deployment, Codefresh simplifies the process by providing native support and a user-friendly interface for managing Helm charts.
Community and Integration Ecosystem: CircleCI has a large community and integrations ecosystem, with a wide range of supported plugins and third-party integrations, offering extensive customization options. Codefresh, while also having a decent range of integrations, has a smaller community but focuses on providing a curated set of integrations and plugins with a strong emphasis on Kubernetes and Docker ecosystem.

CircleCI vs Codefresh

Overview