CircleCI vs Claudia

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

Claudia

Stacks29

Followers55

Votes2

GitHub Stars3.9K

Forks277

CircleCI vs Claudia: What are the differences?

What is CircleCI? Automate your development process quickly, safely, and at scale. Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

What is Claudia? Deploy Node.js microservices to AWS Lambda and API Gateway easily. Claudia helps you deploy Node.js microservices to Amazon Web Services easily. It automates and simplifies deployment workflows and error prone tasks, so you can focus on important problems and not have to worry about AWS service quirks.

CircleCI belongs to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack, while Claudia can be primarily classified under "Microservices Tools".

Some of the features offered by CircleCI are:

Language-Inclusive Support
Custom Environments
Flexible Resource Allocation

On the other hand, Claudia provides the following key features:

Create or update Lambda functions and Web APIs from Node.js projects hassle-free
Automatically configure the Lambda function for commonly useful tasks
Automatically set up API Gateway resources the way Javascript developers expect them to work

Claudia is an open source tool with 3.19K GitHub stars and 221 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Claudia's open source repository on GitHub.

9GAG, CircleCI, and Coinbase are some of the popular companies that use CircleCI, whereas Claudia is used by TOKENEXT, Surdo para Surdo, and FundsCorner. CircleCI has a broader approval, being mentioned in 925 company stacks & 372 developers stacks; compared to Claudia, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Claudia

Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

Reviewon

CircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	Claudia
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	Claudia helps you deploy Node.js microservices to Amazon Web Services easily. It automates and simplifies deployment workflows and error prone tasks, so you can focus on important problems and not have to worry about AWS service quirks.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	Create or update Lambda functions and Web APIs from Node.js projects hassle-free;Automatically configure the Lambda function for commonly useful tasks;Automatically set up API Gateway resources the way Javascript developers expect them to work
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.9K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 277
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 29
Followers 7.1K	Followers 55
Votes 974	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 2 Easy setup
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	Node.js AWS Lambda Amazon API Gateway

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Claudia?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by CircleCI are:

Language-Inclusive Support
Custom Environments
Flexible Resource Allocation

On the other hand, Claudia provides the following key features:

Create or update Lambda functions and Web APIs from Node.js projects hassle-free
Automatically configure the Lambda function for commonly useful tasks
Automatically set up API Gateway resources the way Javascript developers expect them to work

Claudia is an open source tool with 3.19K GitHub stars and 221 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Claudia's open source repository on GitHub.

CircleCI vs Claudia