StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Cilium vs Istio

Cilium vs Istio

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Istio
Istio
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.5K
Votes54
GitHub Stars37.6K
Forks8.1K
Cilium
Cilium
Stacks38
Followers81
Votes1
GitHub Stars22.8K
Forks3.4K

Cilium vs Istio: What are the differences?

Cilium and Istio are two popular technologies in the field of networking and service mesh. Let's discuss the key differences between them:

  1. Scalability: Cilium is known for its high scalability with optimized packet processing, enabling it to handle a massive number of connections. On the other hand, Istio provides scalability through its load balancing and traffic management capabilities, allowing for efficient distribution of network traffic.

  2. Security: Cilium focuses on providing network security at the individual workload level. It employs BPF-based technology to enforce fine-grained security policies and protect workloads from network attacks. In contrast, Istio offers a comprehensive security framework that includes features like mutual TLS authentication, access control policies, and secure service communication.

  3. API Support: Cilium provides a powerful native API for managing networking and security policies. Its API allows for programmatic control of fine-grained security rules and powerful network policies. Istio, on the other hand, allows users to control its functionality through its REST APIs and configuration files.

  4. Traffic Management: Istio excels in traffic management capabilities, providing features like load balancing, traffic routing, and canary deployments. It allows for more control over network traffic routing and can integrate with various service discovery mechanisms. Cilium also offers some traffic management capabilities, but it primarily focuses on providing secure network connectivity.

  5. Observability: Both Cilium and Istio offer observability features, but with different approaches. Cilium leverages eBPF technology to collect detailed network metrics, allowing for deep visibility into network traffic. In contrast, Istio provides observability features through its telemetry stack, allowing for monitoring and tracing of service requests across the service mesh.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Both Cilium and Istio have vibrant open-source communities and a wide range of integrations with other technologies. However, Istio has a larger community and ecosystem due to its early adoption by major cloud providers, making it more mature and offering more options for integration with various tools and platforms.

In summary, Cilium focuses on scalability, individual workload security, and provides a powerful native API, while Istio places more emphasis on traffic management, comprehensive security features, and offers a larger community and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Istio, Cilium

Prateek
Prateek

Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k
Comments
lyc218
lyc218

Feb 21, 2020

Needs advice

Envoy proxy is widely adopted in many companies for service mesh proxy, but it utilizes BoringSSL by default. Red Hat OpenShift fork envoy branch with their own OpenSSL support, I wonder any other companies are also using envoy-openssl branch for compatibility? How about AWS App Mesh?

Any input would be much appreciated!

42.8k views42.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Istio
Istio
Cilium
Cilium

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Open source software for providing and transparently securing network connectivity and loadbalancing between application workloads such as application containers or processes.

-
Identity Based Security - Cilium visibility and security policies are based on the container orchestrator identity (e.g., Kubernetes labels). Never again worry about network subnets or container IP addresses when writing security policies, auditing, or troubleshooting.; Blazing Performance - BPF is the underlying Linux superpower to do the heavy lifting on the datapath by providing sandboxed programmability of the Linux kernel with incredible performance.; API-Protocol Visibility + Security - Traditional firewalls only see and filter packets based on network headers like IP address and ports. Cilium can do this as well, but also understands and filters the individual HTTP, gRPC, and Kafka requests that stitch microservices together.; Designed for Scale - Cilium was designed for scale, with no node-to-node interactions required when new pods are deployed, and all coordination through a highly scalable key-value store.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
37.6K
GitHub Stars
22.8K
GitHub Forks
8.1K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
38
Followers
1.5K
Followers
81
Votes
54
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Zero code for logging and monitoring
  • 9
    Service Mesh
  • 8
    Great flexibility
  • 5
    Powerful authorization mechanisms
  • 5
    Resiliency
Cons
  • 17
    Performance
Pros
  • 1
    Sidecarless
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Kafka
Kafka
gRPC
gRPC
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos

What are some alternatives to Istio, Cilium?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp