StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Apache Spark vs Celery

Apache Spark vs Celery

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Celery
Celery
Stacks1.7K
Followers1.6K
Votes280
GitHub Stars27.5K
Forks4.9K
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Stacks3.1K
Followers3.5K
Votes140
GitHub Stars42.2K
Forks28.9K

Apache Spark vs Celery: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Spark and Celery are both distributed computing frameworks used for processing large amounts of data. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between them that make them suited for different use cases.

  1. Execution Model: Apache Spark uses a distributed computing model where data is processed in parallel across a cluster of machines. It provides a high-level API and supports various programming languages. On the other hand, Celery is a task queue system that allows you to distribute tasks across worker nodes. It follows a message-passing model where tasks are executed asynchronously.

  2. Data Processing Paradigm: Spark is designed for big data processing and provides a rich set of built-in libraries for batch processing, streaming, machine learning, and graph processing. It supports in-memory data processing and can handle large-scale data processing efficiently. In contrast, Celery is more focused on task scheduling and message passing. It does not provide built-in tools for complex data processing tasks like Spark.

  3. Fault Tolerance: Spark provides fault tolerance through its Resilient Distributed Dataset (RDD) abstraction. RDDs are fault-tolerant data structures that can be stored in memory and recalculated if a node fails. This allows Spark to recover from failures and continue processing without losing data. Celery, on the other hand, does not provide built-in fault tolerance mechanisms. If a worker fails, the task may need to be rescheduled or reprocessed manually.

  4. Integration with Ecosystem: Apache Spark is part of a larger ecosystem known as the Apache Big Data Stack. It can integrate with other Apache projects like Hadoop, Hive, and HBase, making it suitable for building end-to-end big data solutions. Celery, on the other hand, is a standalone task queue system and does not have built-in integrations with big data technologies.

  5. Concurrency Model: Spark uses a master-worker architecture where a central driver program coordinates the execution of tasks on worker nodes. This allows Spark to leverage parallelism and distribute work efficiently. Celery, on the other hand, uses a decentralized architecture where tasks are executed independently by worker nodes. This makes Celery more scalable and flexible for task distribution.

  6. Community and Documentation: Apache Spark has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. It is widely adopted in industry and has a mature ecosystem. Celery also has a community and documentation, but it is not as extensive or mature as Spark's community.

In summary, Apache Spark and Celery are both distributed computing frameworks, but they have key differences in their execution model, data processing paradigm, fault tolerance, integration with the ecosystem, concurrency model, and community/documentation. Spark is more suited for big data processing with its rich set of libraries and integration with big data technologies, while Celery focuses on task scheduling and message passing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Celery, Apache Spark

Nilesh
Nilesh

Technical Architect at Self Employed

Jul 8, 2020

Needs adviceonElasticsearchElasticsearchKafkaKafka

We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.

In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.

In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.

576k views576k
Comments
Shantha
Shantha

Sep 30, 2020

Needs adviceonRabbitMQRabbitMQCeleryCeleryMongoDBMongoDB

I am just a beginner at these two technologies.

Problem statement: I am getting lakh of users from the sequel server for whom I need to create caches in MongoDB by making different REST API requests.

Here these users can be treated as messages. Each REST API request is a task.

I am confused about whether I should go for RabbitMQ alone or Celery.

If I have to go with RabbitMQ, I prefer to use python with Pika module. But the challenge with Pika is, it is not thread-safe. So I am not finding a way to execute a lakh of API requests in parallel using multiple threads using Pika.

If I have to go with Celery, I don't know how I can achieve better scalability in executing these API requests in parallel.

334k views334k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Celery
Celery
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

-
Run programs up to 100x faster than Hadoop MapReduce in memory, or 10x faster on disk;Write applications quickly in Java, Scala or Python;Combine SQL, streaming, and complex analytics;Spark runs on Hadoop, Mesos, standalone, or in the cloud. It can access diverse data sources including HDFS, Cassandra, HBase, S3
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.5K
GitHub Stars
42.2K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
28.9K
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
3.1K
Followers
1.6K
Followers
3.5K
Votes
280
Votes
140
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Task queue
  • 63
    Python integration
  • 40
    Django integration
  • 30
    Scheduled Task
  • 19
    Publish/subsribe
Cons
  • 4
    Sometimes loses tasks
  • 1
    Depends on broker
Pros
  • 61
    Open-source
  • 48
    Fast and Flexible
  • 8
    One platform for every big data problem
  • 8
    Great for distributed SQL like applications
  • 6
    Easy to install and to use
Cons
  • 4
    Speed

What are some alternatives to Celery, Apache Spark?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase