Cassandra聽vs聽Elasticsearch

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cassandra

3.2K
3.2K
+ 1
492
Elasticsearch

26.6K
20.4K
+ 1
1.6K
Add tool

Cassandra vs Elasticsearch: What are the differences?

Developers describe Cassandra as "A partitioned row store. Rows are organized into tables with a required primary key". Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL. On the other hand, Elasticsearch is detailed as "Open Source, Distributed, RESTful Search Engine". Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Cassandra belongs to "Databases" category of the tech stack, while Elasticsearch can be primarily classified under "Search as a Service".

"Distributed", "High performance" and "High availability" are the key factors why developers consider Cassandra; whereas "Powerful api", "Great search engine" and "Open source" are the primary reasons why Elasticsearch is favored.

Cassandra and Elasticsearch are both open source tools. Elasticsearch with 42.4K GitHub stars and 14.2K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Cassandra with 5.27K GitHub stars and 2.35K GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Elasticsearch has a broader approval, being mentioned in 2003 company stacks & 979 developers stacks; compared to Cassandra, which is listed in 342 company stacks and 240 developer stacks.

Advice on Cassandra and Elasticsearch
Rana Usman Shahid
Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza | 5 upvotes 路 182.3K views
Needs advice
on
FirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearch
and
AlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

See more
Replies (2)
Josh Dzielak
Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit | 7 upvotes 路 138.4K views
Recommends
AlgoliaAlgolia

Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.

To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.

See more
Mike Endale
Recommends
Cloud FirestoreCloud Firestore

Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.

For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.

Hope this helps.

See more
Vinay Mehta
Needs advice
on
ScyllaScylla
and
CassandraCassandra

The problem I have is - we need to process & change(update/insert) 55M Data every 2 min and this updated data to be available for Rest API for Filtering / Selection. Response time for Rest API should be less than 1 sec.

The most important factors for me are processing and storing time of 2 min. There need to be 2 views of Data One is for Selection & 2. Changed data.

See more
Replies (4)
Pankaj Soni
Chief Technical Officer at Software Joint | 2 upvotes 路 61.1K views
Recommends
CassandraCassandra

i love syclla for pet projects however it's license which is based on server model is an issue. thus i recommend cassandra

See more
Recommends
ScyllaScylla

Scylla can handle 1M/s events with a simple data model quite easily. The api to query is CQL, we have REST api but that's for control/monitoring

See more
Alex Peake
Recommends
CassandraCassandra

Cassandra is quite capable of the task, in a highly available way, given appropriate scaling of the system. Remember that updates are only inserts, and that efficient retrieval is only by key (which can be a complex key). Talking of keys, make sure that the keys are well distributed.

See more
Recommends
ScyllaScylla

By 55M do you mean 55 million entity changes per 2 minutes? It is relatively high, means almost 460k per second. If I had to choose between Scylla or Cassandra, I would opt for Scylla as it is promising better performance for simple operations. However, maybe it would be worth to consider yet another alternative technology. Take into consideration required consistency, reliability and high availability and you may realize that there are more suitable once. Rest API should not be the main driver, because you can always develop the API yourself, if not supported by given technology.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of Cassandra
Pros of Elasticsearch
  • 114
    Distributed
  • 95
    High performance
  • 80
    High availability
  • 74
    Easy scalability
  • 52
    Replication
  • 26
    Multi datacenter deployments
  • 26
    Reliable
  • 8
    OLTP
  • 7
    Open source
  • 7
    Schema optional
  • 2
    Workload separation (via MDC)
  • 1
    Fast
  • 321
    Powerful api
  • 311
    Great search engine
  • 230
    Open source
  • 213
    Restful
  • 199
    Near real-time search
  • 96
    Free
  • 83
    Search everything
  • 54
    Easy to get started
  • 45
    Analytics
  • 26
    Distributed
  • 6
    Fast search
  • 5
    More than a search engine
  • 3
    Great docs
  • 3
    Easy to scale
  • 3
    Awesome, great tool
  • 2
    Document Store
  • 2
    Nosql DB
  • 2
    Great piece of software
  • 2
    Potato
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Intuitive API
  • 2
    Fast
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Highly Available
  • 1
    Open
  • 1
    Scalability
  • 1
    Easy to get hot data
  • 1
    Github
  • 1
    Elaticsearch
  • 1
    Actively developing
  • 1
    Responsive maintainers on GitHub
  • 1
    Ecosystem
  • 1
    Not stable
  • 1
    Reliable
  • 0
    Community

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Cassandra
Cons of Elasticsearch
  • 2
    Reliability of replication
  • 1
    Updates
  • 6
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Cassandra?

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

What is Elasticsearch?

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Cassandra?
What companies use Elasticsearch?
See which teams inside your own company are using Cassandra or Elasticsearch.
Sign up for Private StackShareLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Cassandra?
What tools integrate with Elasticsearch?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Cassandra and Elasticsearch?
HBase
Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.
Hadoop
The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.
Redis
Redis is an open source, BSD licensed, advanced key-value store. It is often referred to as a data structure server since keys can contain strings, hashes, lists, sets and sorted sets.
Couchbase
Developed as an alternative to traditionally inflexible SQL databases, the Couchbase NoSQL database is built on an open source foundation and architected to help developers solve real-world problems and meet high scalability demands.
MySQL
The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
See all alternatives