StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bulma vs Tailwind CSS

Bulma vs Tailwind CSS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bulma
Bulma
Stacks780
Followers855
Votes38
GitHub Stars50.0K
Forks3.9K
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.1K
Votes245

Bulma vs Tailwind CSS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bulma and Tailwind CSS are both popular CSS frameworks that are used to build user interfaces for websites. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Design Philosophy: Bulma follows a more opinionated and strict design philosophy, providing a set of predefined styles and components that are ready to use out of the box. On the other hand, Tailwind CSS follows a utility-first approach, allowing developers to build custom UI components using utility classes.

  2. CSS Output: Bulma generates clean and semantic CSS classes, making it easy to understand and maintain the code. In contrast, Tailwind CSS generates a larger amount of CSS classes due to its utility-first approach, which can result in a larger file size.

  3. Customization: Bulma offers some level of customization through Sass variables, allowing you to modify aspects like colors and typography. However, the room for customization is limited compared to Tailwind CSS. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, provides extensive customization options through its configuration file, enabling you to define your own utility classes and styles.

  4. Learning Curve: Bulma has a relatively straightforward learning curve, as it provides a consistent set of predefined components and styles to work with. On the contrary, Tailwind CSS has a steeper learning curve, as it requires a deeper understanding of its utility classes and the ability to compose these classes to build UI components.

  5. Responsive Design: Bulma comes with built-in support for responsive design, making it easy to create responsive layouts and components. In comparison, Tailwind CSS provides an extensive set of utility classes for responsive design, giving more flexibility but also requiring more manual work to achieve responsive layouts.

  6. Community Support: Bulma has a strong and active community with a wide range of resources, including documentation, tutorials, and community plugins. Tailwind CSS also has a growing community, but it might not have as many resources and plugins available as Bulma.

In summary, Bulma and Tailwind CSS differ in their design philosophy, CSS output, customization options, learning curve, responsive design support, and community support. Both frameworks have their strengths and weaknesses, so the choice between them depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bulma, Tailwind CSS

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bulma
Bulma
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS

Bulma is a CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

-
No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity
Statistics
GitHub Stars
50.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
780
Stacks
4.8K
Followers
855
Followers
3.1K
Votes
38
Votes
245
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Community-created themes
  • 6
    Easy-to-customize the sass build
  • 5
    Great docs
  • 5
    Responsive
Cons
  • 2
    Not yet supporting Vue 3
Pros
  • 44
    Highly customizable
  • 33
    Quick setup
  • 30
    Utility first styles, its amazing
  • 24
    Versatile
  • 23
    Great docs
Cons
  • 14
    Priced
  • 5
    Cluttered html structure

What are some alternatives to Bulma, Tailwind CSS?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase