Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Buildkite vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?
**Introduction:**
Key differences between Buildkite and Jenkins X:
1. **Architecture**: Buildkite follows a lightweight agent-based architecture where agents are responsible for executing tasks and sending logs back to the server. On the other hand, Jenkins X utilizes Kubernetes native constructs and serverless Jenkins to manage pipelines and builds, resulting in a more scalable and automated infrastructure.
2. **CI/CD Workflow**: Buildkite focuses primarily on Continuous Integration (CI) by providing a simple platform for running build jobs, while Jenkins X is more centered around Continuous Delivery (CD) and GitOps, incorporating features like automated deployments, environment promotion, and versioning for Kubernetes deployments.
3. **GitOps Integration**: Jenkins X has built-in support for GitOps practices, allowing users to manage infrastructure and deployments using version-controlled configurations stored in a Git repository. Buildkite, on the other hand, lacks native GitOps integration out of the box but can be extended through custom integrations.
4. **Cloud Native Development**: Jenkins X is designed for cloud-native applications and containerized environments, providing streamlined workflows for building, testing, and deploying applications on Kubernetes. Buildkite, while versatile, does not have the same level of integration and native support for cloud-native development practices.
5. **Community and Plugins**: Jenkins X has a robust community and ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and integrations tailored for Kubernetes and cloud-native environments, allowing users to easily extend and customize the platform. Buildkite, although extensible through plugins and webhooks, may have limitations in terms of community support and available integrations.
6. **Ease of Use**: In terms of user experience, Buildkite is known for its simplicity and minimalistic design, making it easy to set up and use for basic CI/CD needs. Jenkins X, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve due to its Kubernetes-centric approach and more comprehensive feature set.
In Summary, the key differences between Buildkite and Jenkins X lie in their architecture, focus on CI/CD workflows, GitOps integration, cloud-native development support, community ecosystem, and ease of use.
We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.
Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.
We primarily need:
- Fast SBT builds (caching)
- Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
- Everything as code
- Ease of use
I think I've tried most of the CI tools out there at some point. It took me a while to get around to Buildkite because at first I didn't see much point given it seemed like you had to run the agent yourself. Eventually it dawned on me why this approach was more ingenious than I realised:
Running my app in a production (or production-like) environment was already a solved problem, because everything was already in some form of "everything as code". Having a test environment where the only difference was adding the Buildkite agent was a trivial addition.
It means that dev/test/prod parity is simple to achieve and maintain. It's also proven to be much easier to support than trying to deal with the problems that come with trying to force an app to fit into the nuances and constraints that are imposed by the containers/runtime of a CI service. When you completely control all of the environment the tests are running in you define those constraints too. It's been a great balance between a managed service and the flexibility of running it yourself.
And while none of my needs have hit the scale of Shopify (I saw one of their engineers speak about it at a conference once, I can't find the video now though ๐) it's good to know I can scale out my worker nodes to hundreds of thousands of workers to reduce the time it takes for my tests to run.
I would recommend you to consider the JFrog Platform that includes JFrog Pipelines - it will allow you to manage the full artifact life cycle for your sbt, docker and other technologies, and automate all of your CI and CD using cloud native declarative yaml pipelines. Will integrate smoothly with all your other toolset.
more configurable to setup ci/cd: * It can provide caching when build sbt, just add this section to yml file * Easy to use, many documentation
Weakness: * Need use gitlab as repository to bring more powerful configuration
Pros of Buildkite
- Great customer support18
- Github integration17
- Easy to use16
- Easy setup16
- Simplicity12
- Simple deployments10
- Simple and powerful configuration9
- Bitbucket integration4
- Github enterprise integration3
- Amazing swag3
- Integrates with everything2
- Sourcecode is hosted by source code owner.1
- Configuration in cloud1
- Run your own test containers with their AWS stack file1
- Superior user experience1
- Great ui1
Pros of Jenkins X
- Kubernetes integration7
- Scripted Pipelines5
- GitOps4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Buildkite
Cons of Jenkins X
- Complexity1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Buildkite?
What is Jenkins X?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Buildkite?
What companies use Jenkins X?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Jenkins X?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+17
+10
+47
+43
+35