StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Buefy vs Bulma

Buefy vs Bulma

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bulma
Bulma
Stacks780
Followers855
Votes38
GitHub Stars50.0K
Forks3.9K
Buefy
Buefy
Stacks98
Followers164
Votes9
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks1.1K

Buefy vs Bulma: What are the differences?

Introduction

Buefy and Bulma are two popular CSS frameworks used for building responsive websites. Buefy is a UI components library for Vue.js, which integrates with Bulma and provides ready-to-use components. Bulma, on the other hand, is a CSS framework that allows developers to build modern and responsive websites with ease.

  1. Integration with Vue.js: Buefy is specifically designed to work with Vue.js, as it is a Vue-based implementation of the Bulma CSS framework. It provides Vue components that can easily be used in a Vue application. In contrast, Bulma is a standalone CSS framework that can be used with any JavaScript framework or even without any framework at all.

  2. Component Library: Buefy offers a comprehensive collection of pre-designed and ready-to-use UI components that are built using Bulma's CSS classes. These components include buttons, forms, modals, navbar, tabs, and more. Bulma, on the other hand, does not provide any built-in components and is primarily focused on providing a set of CSS classes for building responsive websites. Developers using Bulma need to create their own custom components.

  3. Ease of Use and Customization: Buefy simplifies the development process by providing pre-built components that can be easily used in a Vue application. Developers can easily customize and extend these components according to their specific requirements. On the other hand, Bulma provides a set of CSS classes that can be used to build a responsive layout and UI components. Customization in Bulma requires writing custom CSS or Sass code.

  4. Community Support: Both Buefy and Bulma have active communities and provide support through forums, documentation, and GitHub repositories. However, Buefy being a UI components library for Vue.js benefits from the existing Vue.js community, which is known for its strong support and active development.

  5. JavaScript Interaction: Buefy provides JavaScript interactions for its components out of the box. For example, the Buefy modal component can easily be controlled using JavaScript. On the other hand, Bulma does not provide any JavaScript interactions for its components by default. Developers using Bulma need to write their own JavaScript code to add interactivity to the components.

  6. Size and Performance: Buefy adds an additional layer on top of Bulma, incorporating its own components and functionality. This can result in a larger overall bundle size and a slight performance overhead compared to using Bulma directly. However, the impact on performance is generally minimal.

In Summary, Buefy is a Vue.js UI components library that integrates with Bulma and provides ready-to-use components, while Bulma is a standalone CSS framework that provides a set of CSS classes for building responsive websites. The key differences between the two are Buefy's integration with Vue.js, its component library, ease of use, community support, built-in JavaScript interactions, and possible impact on size and performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bulma, Buefy

Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bulma
Bulma
Buefy
Buefy

Bulma is a CSS framework based on Flexbox and built with Sass

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
50.0K
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Forks
3.9K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
780
Stacks
98
Followers
855
Followers
164
Votes
38
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Easy-to-customize the sass build
  • 6
    Community-created themes
  • 5
    Great docs
  • 5
    Responsive
Cons
  • 2
    Not yet supporting Vue 3
Pros
  • 4
    Small and lightweight
  • 4
    Ease of integration into an existing project
  • 1
    Rich components
Cons
  • 2
    Not supported by a well known company
Integrations
No integrations available
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to Bulma, Buefy?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase