Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BrowserStack vs Selenium: What are the differences?
Introduction
BrowserStack and Selenium are both popular tools used for testing web applications. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between them. In this article, we will explore and highlight these differences.
Deployment: BrowserStack is a cloud-based tool that allows users to perform cross-browser testing on various devices and browsers without the need for maintaining a complex infrastructure. Selenium, on the other hand, is an open-source framework that requires setting up and configuring test environments manually. This makes BrowserStack a more convenient option for teams who want to perform testing on different browser and device combinations quickly and efficiently.
Browser and Device Support: BrowserStack provides an extensive range of browsers and devices for testing, including both desktop and mobile platforms. It allows testing on different versions of popular browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, etc. Selenium, being a framework, relies on browser drivers for testing. While it does support multiple browsers, the availability of drivers might be limited or may require additional effort to set up. BrowserStack offers a more comprehensive and hassle-free solution for testing across various platforms.
Parallel Testing: BrowserStack allows for parallel testing, which means running tests on multiple devices and browsers simultaneously. This can significantly reduce the time required for test execution, especially when testing on a large number of browser versions and platforms. Selenium, on the other hand, does not provide built-in support for parallel testing. Although it is possible to implement parallel testing with Selenium using additional tools or frameworks, it requires more effort and expertise.
Real Device Testing: BrowserStack provides the option to test applications on real devices. This is particularly important for testing mobile applications that require access to device-specific features like camera, GPS, or accelerometer. Selenium, being primarily a web automation tool, does not offer native support for testing on real devices. While it is possible to use Selenium with third-party tools or frameworks to test on real devices, it requires additional setup and configuration.
Pricing Model: BrowserStack operates on a subscription-based pricing model. Users pay a fixed fee based on the number of parallel test sessions and the duration of the subscription. The cost increases with the number of parallel sessions and the desired access to the real device cloud. Selenium, being an open-source framework, does not have any direct costs associated with it. However, there may be additional expenses for infrastructure setup, maintenance, and integration with other tools or frameworks.
Community Support: Selenium has a large and active community of developers and testers. This means that there is a wealth of online resources, forums, and community-driven support available for troubleshooting and sharing knowledge. BrowserStack, while it also has a support team and documentation available, may have a more limited community support compared to Selenium.
In summary, BrowserStack offers a cloud-based solution for cross-browser and real device testing with extensive browser and device support, parallel testing capabilities, and a subscription-based pricing model. Selenium, being an open-source framework, requires manual setup, provides support for multiple browsers but may require additional effort for different platforms, and relies on community-driven support.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................
with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing
Pros of BrowserStack
- Multiple browsers134
- Ease of use75
- Real browsers64
- Ability to use it locally43
- Good price26
- Great web interface20
- IE support18
- Official mobile emulators16
- Instant access14
- Cloud-based access14
- Real mobile devices11
- Multiple Desktop OS7
- Selenium compatible7
- Screenshots7
- Can be used for Testing and E2E6
- Pre-installed developer tools5
- Video of test runs4
- Many browsers3
- Favourites3
- Webdriver compatible3
- Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing3
- Free for Open Source2
- Unify and track test cases2
- Test automation dashboard2
- Test Management2
- Cross-browser testing2
- Cypress Compatible2
- Bi-directional Jira Sync2
- Speed is fast1
- Real devices1
- Visual testing and review0
- Test WCAG Compliance0
- Web accessibility0
Pros of Selenium
- Automates browsers177
- Testing154
- Essential tool for running test automation101
- Record-Playback24
- Remote Control24
- Data crawling8
- Supports end to end testing7
- Easy set up6
- Functional testing6
- The Most flexible monitoring system4
- End to End Testing3
- Easy to integrate with build tools3
- Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm2
- Record and playback2
- Compatible with Python2
- Easy to scale2
- Integration Tests2
- Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BrowserStack
- Very limited choice of minor versions2
Cons of Selenium
- Flaky tests8
- Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)4
- Update browser drivers2