Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BrowserStack vs Nightwatchjs: What are the differences?
- Deployment: BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that allows users to test websites on various operating systems and browsers, whereas Nightwatchjs is a node.js based automated testing framework for web applications.
- Support for Multiple Platforms: BrowserStack provides support for testing on numerous platforms including real devices and simulators, while Nightwatchjs mainly focuses on web browser automation for testing.
- Integration: BrowserStack seamlessly integrates with popular testing frameworks like Selenium, Appium, and more, whereas Nightwatchjs is a standalone testing framework that can be integrated with other tools through plugins.
- Programming Language: BrowserStack supports testing in multiple programming languages including Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, etc., while Nightwatchjs primarily uses JavaScript for writing automated tests.
- Community Support: Nightwatchjs has an active community contributing to its development and sharing resources, whereas BrowserStack primarily offers customer support through their platform for users.
- Cost: BrowserStack is a paid service with various subscription options based on usage, whereas Nightwatchjs is an open-source tool that is free to use.
In Summary, BrowserStack and Nightwatchjs differ in deployment, platform support, integration, programming language, community support, and cost.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
Pros of BrowserStack
- Multiple browsers134
- Ease of use75
- Real browsers64
- Ability to use it locally43
- Good price26
- Great web interface20
- IE support18
- Official mobile emulators16
- Instant access14
- Cloud-based access14
- Real mobile devices11
- Multiple Desktop OS7
- Selenium compatible7
- Screenshots7
- Can be used for Testing and E2E6
- Pre-installed developer tools5
- Video of test runs4
- Many browsers3
- Favourites3
- Webdriver compatible3
- Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing3
- Free for Open Source2
- Unify and track test cases2
- Test automation dashboard2
- Test Management2
- Cross-browser testing2
- Cypress Compatible2
- Bi-directional Jira Sync2
- Speed is fast1
- Real devices1
- Visual testing and review0
- Test WCAG Compliance0
- Web accessibility0
Pros of Nightwatchjs
- Open source3
- Testing2
- Automates browsers2
- Better cross browser (use selenium)1
- Cross-Browser Testing1
- Multiple Browser Support1
- Parallel Test Running1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BrowserStack
- Very limited choice of minor versions2
Cons of Nightwatchjs
- No automatic wait2
- Less flexibility1
- Limited native mobile app support1
- Limited browser support1
- Configuration complexity1
