BrowserStack vs Jest

Overview

BrowserStack

Stacks2.7K

Followers2.0K

Votes533

Jest

Stacks15.2K

Followers4.1K

Votes175

BrowserStack vs Jest: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between BrowserStack and Jest - two popular tools used in web development and testing. Markdown code will be used to format the content for easy integration into a website.

Deployment and Compatibility: BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that allows developers to test their web applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It provides a wide range of browser versions and real devices for testing. On the other hand, Jest is a JavaScript testing framework mainly used for testing React applications. It runs in the Node.js environment and is compatible with various browsers.
Automation and Parallel Testing: BrowserStack offers advanced automation features that allow developers to run automated tests on multiple machines, browsers, or devices in parallel. It provides a seamless integration with popular automation frameworks such as Selenium, Appium, and more. In contrast, Jest is primarily designed for unit testing and lacks the extensive parallel testing capabilities offered by BrowserStack.
Cross-browser Testing: BrowserStack allows developers to test their web applications on a wide range of browsers and browser versions. It ensures compatibility across different platforms and helps identify any browser-specific issues. Jest, however, focuses more on unit testing and may not offer the same level of cross-browser testing capabilities as BrowserStack.
Performance Testing: BrowserStack provides performance testing features that allow developers to measure the performance of their web applications under different network conditions. It helps identify bottlenecks and optimize the performance of the application. On the other hand, Jest is primarily focused on testing the functionality of the code and may not provide extensive performance testing capabilities.
Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: BrowserStack seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, CircleCI, and TravisCI, allowing developers to incorporate automated testing in their continuous integration and deployment pipelines. Jest, being a JavaScript testing framework, can also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, but may require additional configuration and setup compared to BrowserStack.
Test Reporting and Insights: BrowserStack provides comprehensive test reports and insights, allowing developers to analyze test results, track test coverage, and identify areas for improvement. It offers detailed logs, screenshots, and videos of test sessions for better debugging and troubleshooting. Jest also provides test reporting features, but its focus is primarily on unit testing and may not offer the same level of reporting and insights as BrowserStack.

In Summary, BrowserStack is a versatile cloud-based testing platform that provides extensive cross-browser testing, advanced automation features, and comprehensive test reporting capabilities. Jest, on the other hand, is a JavaScript testing framework primarily focused on unit testing and may require additional tools or services for features like cross-browser testing and performance testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on BrowserStack, Jest

Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Selenium

Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k

Comments

Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Cypress

Jest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k

Comments

Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack	Jest
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.	Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.
Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x	Familiar Approach: Built on top of the Jasmine test framework, using familiar expect(value).toBe(other) assertions;Mock by Default: Automatically mocks CommonJS modules returned by require(), making most existing code testable;Short Feedback Loop: DOM APIs are mocked and tests run in parallel via a small node.js command line utility
Statistics
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 15.2K
Followers 2.0K	Followers 4.1K
Votes 533	Votes 175
Pros & Cons
Pros 135 Multiple browsers 76 Ease of use 65 Real browsers 44 Ability to use it locally 27 Good price Cons 2 Very limited choice of minor versions	Pros 36 Open source 32 Mock by default makes testing much simpler 23 Testing React Native Apps 20 Parallel test running 16 Fast Cons 4 Documentation 4 Ambiguous configuration 3 Difficult 2 Multiple error messages for same error 2 Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting
Integrations
Cypress QMetry Jira WordPress Shopify Zapier Drone.io Jenkins Slack GitLab	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Jest?

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Related Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Jest: What are the differences?

Introduction

Deployment and Compatibility: BrowserStack is a cloud-based testing platform that allows developers to test their web applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It provides a wide range of browser versions and real devices for testing. On the other hand, Jest is a JavaScript testing framework mainly used for testing React applications. It runs in the Node.js environment and is compatible with various browsers.
Automation and Parallel Testing: BrowserStack offers advanced automation features that allow developers to run automated tests on multiple machines, browsers, or devices in parallel. It provides a seamless integration with popular automation frameworks such as Selenium, Appium, and more. In contrast, Jest is primarily designed for unit testing and lacks the extensive parallel testing capabilities offered by BrowserStack.
Cross-browser Testing: BrowserStack allows developers to test their web applications on a wide range of browsers and browser versions. It ensures compatibility across different platforms and helps identify any browser-specific issues. Jest, however, focuses more on unit testing and may not offer the same level of cross-browser testing capabilities as BrowserStack.
Performance Testing: BrowserStack provides performance testing features that allow developers to measure the performance of their web applications under different network conditions. It helps identify bottlenecks and optimize the performance of the application. On the other hand, Jest is primarily focused on testing the functionality of the code and may not provide extensive performance testing capabilities.
Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: BrowserStack seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, CircleCI, and TravisCI, allowing developers to incorporate automated testing in their continuous integration and deployment pipelines. Jest, being a JavaScript testing framework, can also be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, but may require additional configuration and setup compared to BrowserStack.
Test Reporting and Insights: BrowserStack provides comprehensive test reports and insights, allowing developers to analyze test results, track test coverage, and identify areas for improvement. It offers detailed logs, screenshots, and videos of test sessions for better debugging and troubleshooting. Jest also provides test reporting features, but its focus is primarily on unit testing and may not offer the same level of reporting and insights as BrowserStack.

BrowserStack vs Jest

Overview

BrowserStack vs Jest: What are the differences?