Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: What are the differences?
<Write Introduction here>
BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Testing Capabilities BrowserStack allows for cross-browser testing on a wide range of devices and operating systems, providing a comprehensive testing environment. In contrast, Ghostlab focuses on synchronized testing across multiple devices, making it more suitable for testing responsive design elements.
BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Collaborative Features BrowserStack offers features for team collaboration, such as sharing live test environments and test reports, enabling a seamless collaborative testing workflow. Ghostlab lacks extensive collaborative features, focusing more on individual testing needs.
BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Integration with Development Tools BrowserStack integrates well with popular development tools like Jenkins, Jira, and Slack, streamlining the testing process and facilitating automated testing workflows. Ghostlab, on the other hand, is more focused on providing a standalone testing environment rather than extensive integrations.
BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Scalability BrowserStack is designed for scalability, allowing testing on a large number of real devices simultaneously, making it suitable for handling high-volume testing requirements. Ghostlab is better suited for smaller-scale testing scenarios due to its focus on synchronized testing on a limited number of devices.
BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Pricing BrowserStack offers a variety of pricing plans to accommodate different needs, including free trials and pay-as-you-go options, making it flexible for both individuals and enterprises. Ghostlab has a single pricing model, which may be less accommodating for those with varying testing requirements and budgets.
BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Support and Documentation BrowserStack provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and responsive customer support to assist users with onboarding and troubleshooting, ensuring a smooth testing experience. Ghostlab may have limited support resources, potentially leading to challenges in resolving issues efficiently.
In Summary, BrowserStack and Ghostlab differ in testing capabilities, collaborative features, integration with development tools, scalability, pricing, and support resources.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
Pros of BrowserStack
- Multiple browsers134
- Ease of use75
- Real browsers64
- Ability to use it locally43
- Good price26
- Great web interface20
- IE support18
- Official mobile emulators16
- Instant access14
- Cloud-based access14
- Real mobile devices11
- Multiple Desktop OS7
- Selenium compatible7
- Screenshots7
- Can be used for Testing and E2E6
- Pre-installed developer tools5
- Video of test runs4
- Many browsers3
- Favourites3
- Webdriver compatible3
- Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing3
- Free for Open Source2
- Unify and track test cases2
- Test automation dashboard2
- Test Management2
- Cross-browser testing2
- Cypress Compatible2
- Bi-directional Jira Sync2
- Speed is fast1
- Real devices1
- Visual testing and review0
- Test WCAG Compliance0
- Web accessibility0
Pros of Ghostlab
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BrowserStack
- Very limited choice of minor versions2