StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Material Design for Bootstrap

Bootstrap vs Material Design for Bootstrap

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Material Design for Bootstrap
Material Design for Bootstrap
Stacks78
Followers206
Votes46
GitHub Stars65
Forks42

Bootstrap vs Material Design for Bootstrap: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Bootstrap and Material Design for Bootstrap are both popular front-end frameworks used in web development. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Components: Bootstrap offers a wide range of pre-designed components, such as buttons, navigation bars, and form elements, that can be easily customized and integrated into a website. Material Design for Bootstrap, on the other hand, implements the Material Design guidelines by Google, providing a unique set of components with a modern and colorful look.

  2. Visual Style: Bootstrap has a more minimalistic and generic visual style, making it suitable for a variety of website designs. Material Design for Bootstrap, on the other hand, embraces Google's Material Design concept, which prioritizes bold colors, smooth animations, and a sense of depth to create a modern and engaging user interface.

  3. Typography: Bootstrap offers a basic typographic setup that can be easily customized using its utility classes. Material Design for Bootstrap, on the other hand, incorporates the Material Design typographic guidelines, which include unique typography styles such as bold headers, emphasized text, and different sizing options.

  4. Layout Grid: Both Bootstrap and Material Design for Bootstrap utilize a responsive grid system for creating responsive layouts. However, Material Design for Bootstrap enhances the grid with a 12-column layout that follows the Material Design grid guidelines, allowing for more precise and consistent spacing and alignment.

  5. Icons: Bootstrap uses its own icon font called Glyphicons, offering a set of basic icons that can be easily integrated into a website. Material Design for Bootstrap, on the other hand, provides a larger variety of icons through the Material icons library, which includes a vast collection of icons that align with the Material Design concept.

  6. Customization: Bootstrap allows for extensive customization through its SASS variables, allowing developers to modify colors, typography, grid settings, and more. Material Design for Bootstrap also provides customization options through SASS variables, but with a focus on the Material Design color palette and typography styles.

In Summary, Bootstrap offers a wide range of components with a minimalistic visual style, while Material Design for Bootstrap implements the Material Design concept with a unique set of components, bold colors, and modern typography.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Material Design for Bootstrap

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Material Design for Bootstrap
Material Design for Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

It is an open source toolkit based on Bootstrap for developing Material Design apps with HTML, CSS, and JS. Quickly prototype your ideas or build your entire app with our Sass variables and mixins, responsive grid system, extensive prebuilt components, and powerful plugins built on jQuery.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Input fields; Textarea; Buttons (ripple effect working); Select; Navbar; Button groups; Input groups; Checkbox; Radio; Alerts; Progress bars; Jumbotron; Wells; Dialogs; Lists
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
65
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
42
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
78
Followers
13.2K
Followers
206
Votes
7.7K
Votes
46
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 16
    Bootstrap
  • 6
    Awesome and simple to use
  • 6
    Light weight
  • 4
    Google Material Design
  • 4
    Modern Looks
Cons
  • 2
    Not free for premo stuff

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Material Design for Bootstrap?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase