StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Handlebars.js

Bootstrap vs Handlebars.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308

Bootstrap vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Bootstrap and Handlebars.js, two popular web development frameworks.

  1. Responsive Design: Bootstrap is primarily focused on providing a responsive design framework for creating mobile-friendly websites. It offers pre-designed responsive components like grids, navigation bars, and buttons that can be easily implemented in a website. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, is a templating engine that allows developers to create reusable HTML templates and generate dynamic content. It does not provide any specific functionality for responsive design.

  2. Styling Options: Bootstrap comes with a wide range of predefined CSS classes and styles that can be used to customize the appearance of elements within a website. Developers can easily apply these styles to their components to achieve a consistent and visually appealing design. Handlebars.js, being a templating engine, does not provide any styling options out of the box. It is primarily focused on generating dynamic HTML content based on data provided.

  3. Component Library: Bootstrap offers a rich library of pre-built components such as navigation menus, carousels, modals, and more. These components can be easily integrated into a website and customized as per the requirements. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, does not provide any pre-built components. It is solely focused on generating HTML content based on templates and data.

  4. Server-side vs Client-side: Bootstrap is a front-end framework that is mainly used for creating user interfaces on the client-side. It relies on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to create the UI components. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, can be used both on the server-side and client-side. It is commonly used in conjunction with back-end technologies like Node.js to generate HTML content dynamically.

  5. Data Binding: Bootstrap does not provide any built-in data binding capabilities. It mainly focuses on the presentation layer of a website. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, supports data binding by allowing developers to insert placeholders or variables in their templates, which will be replaced with dynamic data at runtime. This makes it easier to generate dynamic content based on changing data.

  6. Integration with other frameworks: Bootstrap can be easily integrated with other JavaScript frameworks like jQuery or AngularJS to enhance its functionality. It provides plugins and extensions that work seamlessly with these frameworks. Handlebars.js, being a standalone templating engine, can be used with any JavaScript framework or library without any specific integration requirements.

In summary, Bootstrap is primarily focused on providing a responsive design framework with pre-built components and styling options, while Handlebars.js is a templating engine that allows for dynamic content generation based on templates and data. Bootstrap is more suitable for front-end development, while Handlebars.js can be used on both the server-side and client-side, supporting data binding and integration with other frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Handlebars.js

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
8.3K
Followers
13.2K
Followers
3.2K
Votes
7.7K
Votes
308
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Integrations
No integrations available
Mustache
Mustache

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Handlebars.js?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase