StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs fancybox

Bootstrap vs fancybox

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
fancybox
fancybox
Stacks5.4K
Followers104
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.3K
Forks1.8K

Bootstrap vs fancybox: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This Markdown code provides information on the key differences between Bootstrap and fancybox.

  1. Overall Design and Features: Bootstrap is a widely-used front-end framework that offers a comprehensive set of design templates, responsive grids, and UI components. It provides a consistent and clean design with built-in responsiveness. On the other hand, fancybox is a jQuery plugin that focuses on displaying images, video, and other media in a customizable lightbox. It provides an elegant and interactive way to showcase media content.

  2. Scope of Functionality: Bootstrap is a complete framework that covers a wide range of design and development aspects, including responsive grids, typography, forms, navigation, and more. It offers a comprehensive solution for building a responsive website. On the contrary, fancybox has a narrower focus on media display and lacks the extensive set of UI components and features provided by Bootstrap.

  3. Ease of Use: Bootstrap is known for its ease of use and user-friendly documentation. It provides ready-to-use classes and components, making it relatively easy for developers to implement a responsive design. In contrast, fancybox requires JavaScript knowledge and additional customization to integrate it into a website. It may require more effort and understanding of jQuery for effective utilization.

  4. Customization Options: Bootstrap offers a wide range of customization options through its Sass-based variables and mixins. It allows developers to easily modify the design elements to match their branding and visual preferences. On the other hand, fancybox provides customization options primarily through its available configuration settings, such as changing the appearance, behavior, and animations of the lightbox.

  5. Community Support and Documentation: Bootstrap has a vast and active community, with extensive documentation, official resources, and numerous third-party plugins and themes available. It provides comprehensive documentation, examples, and support forums that facilitate the learning and implementation of the framework. In comparison, fancybox has a smaller community and fewer resources available, which may limit the availability of pre-built solutions and support options.

  6. Usage and Application: Bootstrap is commonly used for building responsive websites and web applications with a wide range of functionalities. It is suitable for both simple and complex projects. On the other hand, fancybox is primarily used for enhancing media display and creating interactive galleries. It is often utilized in specific scenarios where media presentation plays a significant role, such as portfolio websites or image-centric blogs.

In Summary,

Bootstrap is a comprehensive front-end framework with extensive features and design templates, suitable for building responsive websites and web applications. On the other hand, fancybox is a specialized jQuery plugin that focuses on displaying media content in an elegant and interactive lightbox.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, fancybox

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
fancybox
fancybox

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

It is a tool that offers a nice and elegant way to add zooming functionality for images, html content and multi-media on your webpages. It is built on the top of the popular JavaScript framework jQuery and is both easy to implement and a snap to customize.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
Looks great on every device; Swipe to navigate, spread/pinch to zoom in/out supported on touch devices;Supports most popular sites as YouTube, Vimeo and Google maps out of the box;It is possible to open a modal while another is still visible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
7.3K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
5.4K
Followers
13.2K
Followers
104
Votes
7.7K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
HTML5
HTML5
Google Maps
Google Maps
CSS 3
CSS 3
JavaScript
JavaScript
jQuery
jQuery

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, fancybox?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase