StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Blazor vs Flutter

Blazor vs Flutter

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flutter
Flutter
Stacks17.7K
Followers16.8K
Votes1.2K
GitHub Stars173.7K
Forks29.4K
Blazor
Blazor
Stacks549
Followers724
Votes445

Blazor vs Flutter: What are the differences?

Introduction

Blazor and Flutter are both modern frameworks used for developing web and mobile applications respectively. While Blazor is based on the Microsoft .NET framework and uses C#, Flutter is developed by Google and uses Dart programming language. Despite serving different purposes, there are several key differences between Blazor and Flutter that should be taken into consideration when choosing the appropriate framework.

  1. Architecture: Blazor follows a server-side architecture where the UI components and logic are executed on the server and only the necessary updates are sent to the client. On the other hand, Flutter follows a client-side architecture, where the entire UI rendering and logic execution happen on the client device.

  2. Languages: Blazor uses C# as the primary programming language, which is widely used and has a large developer community. In contrast, Flutter uses Dart, which is a relatively new language but offers a modern syntax and features specifically designed for UI development.

  3. Platform Support: Blazor is primarily designed for web development and can be run on any modern browser. It supports all major platforms, including desktop and mobile. On the other hand, Flutter is primarily focused on mobile application development and provides excellent support for both Android and iOS platforms, while also offering limited support for web and desktop applications.

  4. User Interface: Blazor relies on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript for UI rendering, which provides a high level of customization and flexibility. It allows developers to utilize the full power of web technologies for designing user interfaces. In contrast, Flutter provides a rich set of pre-built UI components called widgets that offer a consistent look and feel across different platforms. It uses its own rendering engine to create highly performant and visually appealing user interfaces.

  5. Development Environment and Tooling: Blazor can be developed using popular IDEs like Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code, which provide excellent tooling and debugging capabilities for .NET development. Flutter, on the other hand, provides its own integrated development environment called Flutter SDK, which includes a set of command-line tools, editor plugins, and a debugging tool that streamline the development process.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Blazor has a well-established and robust community of .NET developers, with a vast ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools that can be leveraged for developing web applications. Flutter, being a relatively new framework, has a rapidly growing community and ecosystem that is dedicated to bridging the gap and providing solutions for various requirements.

In summary, Blazor and Flutter differ in their architecture, programming languages, platform support, user interface approaches, development environments, and the size and maturity of their respective communities and ecosystems. The choice between Blazor and Flutter should be based on the specific requirements and constraints of the project at hand.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flutter, Blazor

Nick
Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 7, 2020

Decided

While with Ionic it is possible to make mobile applications with only web technologies, Flutter is more performant and is easy to use if you are willing to learn Dart, which is a fun language. Plus, it has awesome documentation and, while its ecosystem isn't near as big as JavaScript's is, it has a good package manager called Pub and its packages are generally high quality.

403k views403k
Comments
Thuan
Thuan

FE Lead at SOLID ENGINEER

Jun 16, 2020

Decided
  • Javascripts is the most populated language in the world.
  • Easy to learn & deployed production
  • Fast development
  • Strong community
  • Completed Documents
  • Native performance with lower RAM used.
  • Easy to handle native issues by using native code like Java / Objective C
  • Powered by Facebook.
666k views666k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flutter
Flutter
Blazor
Blazor

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Fast development - Flutter's "hot reload" helps you quickly and easily experiment, build UIs, add features, and fix bug faster. Experience sub-second reload times, without losing state, on emulators, simulators, and hardware for iOS and Android.;Expressive UIs - Delight your users with Flutter's built-in beautiful Material Design and Cupertino (iOS-flavor) widgets, rich motion APIs, smooth natural scrolling, and platform awareness.;Access native features and SDKs - Make your app come to life with platform APIs, 3rd party SDKs, and native code. Flutter lets you reuse your existing Java, Swift, and ObjC code, and access native features and SDKs on iOS and Android.
Uses only the latest web standards; No plugins or transpilation needed; A component model for building composable UI; Routing; Layouts; Forms and validation; Dependency injection; JavaScript interop; Live reloading in the browser during development; Server-side rendering; Full .NET debugging both in browsers and in the IDE; Rich IntelliSense and tooling; Ability to run on older (non-WebAssembly) browsers via asm.js; Publishing and app size trimming
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
29.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
17.7K
Stacks
549
Followers
16.8K
Followers
724
Votes
1.2K
Votes
445
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 149
    Hot Reload
  • 126
    Cross platform
  • 107
    Performance
  • 90
    Backed by Google
  • 74
    Compiled into Native Code
Cons
  • 29
    Need to learn Dart
  • 11
    Lack of community support
  • 10
    No 3D Graphics Engine Support
  • 8
    Graphics programming
  • 6
    Lack of friendly documentation
Pros
  • 63
    Uses C#
  • 49
    No need to learn separate language or technology
  • 42
    Supports making a single page application
  • 40
    Tight integration with .NET project
  • 38
    Uses .NET standard library
Cons
  • 4
    Initial load time
  • 2
    Hard to inject javascript
Integrations
Android SDK
Android SDK
Firebase
Firebase
Dart
Dart
.NET
.NET
C#
C#
WebAssembly
WebAssembly

What are some alternatives to Flutter, Blazor?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase