StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Secrets Management
  4. Password Management
  5. Buttercup vs bitwarden

Buttercup vs bitwarden

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

bitwarden
bitwarden
Stacks227
Followers266
Votes107
Buttercup
Buttercup
Stacks6
Followers33
Votes0
GitHub Stars2
Forks4

Buttercup vs bitwarden: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Buttercup and Bitwarden, two popular password managers.

  1. Cloud Integration: Buttercup provides seamless cloud integration with popular storage providers like Dropbox, Google Drive, and WebDAV. Users can effortlessly synchronize their password vaults across devices through the cloud. On the other hand, Bitwarden offers a similar cloud-based syncing feature, but it goes a step further by providing its own secure cloud-based hosting solution called Bitwarden Cloud. This allows users to sync and access their password vaults from any device without relying on third-party cloud storage providers.

  2. Open Source vs Closed Source: Buttercup is an open-source password manager, which means its source code is freely available for anyone to inspect, modify, or contribute to. This transparency provides a greater level of trust and security as any vulnerabilities or backdoors can be easily identified and fixed by the community. In contrast, Bitwarden is also committed to security but follows a closed-source business model. While they undergo regular security audits and have a strong track record, the inability to review the source code limits the community's ability to vouch for its security.

  3. Encryption Technology: Buttercup embraces end-to-end encryption, ensuring that passwords and sensitive data are encrypted locally before being stored or synchronized. This means the user's master password is never transmitted or stored on any server, rendering it virtually impossible to be accessed by anyone else. In comparison, Bitwarden utilizes a similar end-to-end encryption approach, but it also offers optional two-factor authentication for an extra layer of security. This additional security measure can provide peace of mind for those who value multi-factor authentication.

  4. User Interface: Buttercup boasts a sleek and intuitive user interface with a clean design, making it easy for users to navigate and manage their password vaults efficiently. It offers a range of features like password generation, secure notes, and attachment storage in a straightforward manner. Bitwarden, on the other hand, while equally user-friendly, provides a more polished and modern interface with a greater emphasis on customization. Users can personalize their Bitwarden experience through themes and various customization settings to suit their preferences.

  5. Pricing Model: Buttercup is a completely free password manager, providing all its features without any cost. There are no limitations on the number of passwords or devices used, making it an attractive choice for those seeking a budget-friendly option. Bitwarden offers both a free plan and a premium plan, with the latter providing additional features like 1GB of encrypted file storage and priority customer support. The premium subscription is available at a competitive price, making it an appealing choice for users who require advanced functionalities.

  6. Cross-Platform Support: Buttercup is compatible with a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS. It ensures that users can have a consistent password management experience across all their devices. Similarly, Bitwarden also offers robust cross-platform support, including support for browser extensions on popular browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. This enables users to easily access their password vaults from different devices and browsers seamlessly.

In Summary, Buttercup distinguishes itself with its convenient cloud integration, open-source nature, and simplistic user interface, while Bitwarden shines with its self-hosted cloud option, customization options, and optional two-factor authentication. Both password managers offer strong encryption, cross-platform support, and reliable features, making them worthy contenders in the password management market.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

bitwarden
bitwarden
Buttercup
Buttercup

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

Buttercup is a cross-platform, free, and open source password manager based on NodeJS.

-
Supports loading and saving credentials archives both locally and remotely. Remote archives can be stored in a variety of service providers like Dropbox, ownCloud and Nextcloud (and others that support WebDAV, such as Yandex);Archives store groups and entries in a simple hierarchy. Both groups and entries can be moved into other groups. Deleted items are trashed before being removed permanently.;Basic merge conflict resolution when 2 changes are made at once on the file (locally or remote).;You can import from other password managers (such as 1Password and KeePass) by opening your archive and choosing Import from the menu.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4
Stacks
227
Stacks
6
Followers
266
Followers
33
Votes
107
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Open source
  • 16
    All devices
  • 15
    Synchronized across browsers and devices
  • 12
    Passwords stored encrypted
  • 10
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 3
    Small Developer Team
  • 1
    Difficult to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
GitHub
GitHub
C#
C#
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to bitwarden, Buttercup?

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Passbolt

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

KeePass

KeePass

It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

KeePassXC

KeePassXC

It is a cross-platform community-driven port of the Windows application “Keepass Password Safe”. It can store your passwords safely and auto-type them into your everyday websites and applications.

1Password

1Password

Lock credentials and secrets in vaults that sync across systems and seamlessly access within your dev, CI/CD, and production environments. Plus, generate and use SSH keys directly from 1Password, automate infrastructure secrets, and more.

Dashlane

Dashlane

Dashlane is a password manager and online security app for everyone who lives, works, and plays on the internet.

Password Safe

Password Safe

It is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination").

Azure Active Directory

Azure Active Directory

It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.

OneLogin

OneLogin

OneLogin provides a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) solution that offers simple single sign-on (SSO), making it easier for companies to secure and manage access to web applications both in the cloud and behind the firewall.

gopass

gopass

The slightly more awesome Standard Unix Password Manager for Teams. Written in Go. One explicit goal for this project is to make it more approachable to semi- and non-technical users in the long term as well. We go by the UNIX philosophy and try to do one thing and do it well - always providing stellar user experience and sane, simple interfaces.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack