StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Bitrise vs GitLab

Bitrise vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Bitrise
Bitrise
Stacks342
Followers373
Votes74

Bitrise vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of software development, there are various tools and platforms available to help streamline the development process. Two popular tools in this space are Bitrise and GitLab. While both serve as vital components in the software development lifecycle, they differ in several key aspects. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Bitrise and GitLab.

  1. Integration with other services: Bitrise provides extensive integration capabilities with various third-party services, such as GitHub, JIRA, Slack, and many more. This allows for seamless collaboration and improved workflow management. On the other hand, GitLab offers its own suite of integrated tools, including code repositories, issue tracking, continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD), and more. GitLab's all-in-one solution eliminates the need for integrating multiple services, making it a comprehensive platform for software development projects.

  2. CI/CD capabilities: Bitrise focuses primarily on providing continuous integration and deployment capabilities. It offers a range of features tailored for mobile app development, including automatic code signing, Xcode version management, and support for various languages and frameworks. Meanwhile, GitLab offers a robust CI/CD pipeline solution that can handle various types of projects, not just limited to mobile apps. It allows for powerful customization and scalability, allowing developers to configure their own workflows with ease.

  3. Pricing and availability: Bitrise offers a free plan with limited features, allowing developers to get started without any financial commitment. However, more advanced features and larger team sizes require a paid subscription. GitLab, on the other hand, provides a free and open-source Community Edition, which offers most of the essential features for smaller teams. It also offers various paid plans with additional enterprise-grade features, ideal for larger organizations.

  4. Version control system: Bitrise heavily relies on external version control systems, such as Git or Mercurial, for managing source code. It integrates seamlessly with these systems, allowing developers to easily access and manage their repositories. GitLab, however, provides its own built-in version control system called GitLab Git. It offers all the functionalities of a modern distributed version control system within the GitLab platform.

  5. Community and support: Bitrise has a vibrant community with active forums, blog posts, and tutorials, providing developers with a wealth of knowledge and guidance. They also offer dedicated support channels to help users with any issues they may encounter. GitLab, being an open-source platform, has a large and engaged community contributing to its development. It boasts an extensive documentation library, community forums, and professional support services, making it a reliable resource for developers.

  6. Hosting options: While both Bitrise and GitLab offer cloud hosting options, Bitrise primarily operates as a cloud platform. This means that you don't have to worry about server maintenance or infrastructure management. GitLab, on the other hand, offers the flexibility of hosting either on the cloud or on-premises. This gives organizations the freedom to choose the deployment option that best suits their requirements and security policies.

In summary, Bitrise excels in mobile app development integration, simplicity, and ease of use, making it an ideal choice for teams focused on mobile app development. On the other hand, GitLab provides a comprehensive suite of tools, extensive customization options, and the flexibility of hosting options, making it suitable for a wide range of software development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Bitrise

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Bitrise
Bitrise

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Continuous Delivery;Hosted Environment;Customizable Workflows;Code Security;Open Source;Support by Devs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
342
Followers
54.5K
Followers
373
Votes
2.5K
Votes
74
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 18
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Bitbucket Integration
  • 8
    Advanced Workflow configuration
  • 7
    Slack integration
  • 7
    Github Integration
Integrations
No integrations available
Android SDK
Android SDK
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
TestFlight
TestFlight
TestFairy
TestFairy
Gradle
Gradle
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Xamarin
Xamarin
Slack
Slack
Parse
Parse
Twilio
Twilio

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Bitrise?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana