Bitbucket vs Jenkins

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Bitbucket vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Bitbucket is a web-based code collaboration platform, while Jenkins is an open-source automation server. Bitbucket facilitates version control and team collaboration, while Jenkins enables continuous integration and delivery processes. Let's explore the key differences between them:

Version Control vs. Continuous Integration: Bitbucket is primarily a web-based version control system that offers distributed version control using Git or Mercurial. It provides features such as repository management, code collaboration, and pull requests. On the other hand, Jenkins is a powerful automation server that focuses on continuous integration and delivery. It allows developers to automate the build, test, and deployment processes of their software projects.
Source Code Management vs. Build Automation: Bitbucket provides features for managing source code, including versioning, branching, and merging. It also offers code reviews, branch permissions, and integrations with issue-tracking tools. Jenkins, on the other hand, focuses on build automation and orchestrating various stages of the software development lifecycle. It can integrate with version control systems like Bitbucket to trigger builds, run tests, and deploy applications.
Web-based Interface vs. Build Pipeline: Bitbucket offers a user-friendly web-based interface for managing repositories, reviewing code changes, and collaborating with team members. It provides a centralized platform for developers to work on their code and collaborate effectively. Jenkins, on the other hand, offers a build pipeline approach where developers define a series of build and deployment steps, allowing for more complex and customizable workflows. Jenkins provides a web-based interface for configuring and monitoring pipelines.
Integration and Extensibility: Bitbucket integrates with development tools like issue trackers, continuous integration servers, and project management tools, offering a marketplace for extending its features with plugins. Jenkins, as an automation server, has extensive integration capabilities through plugins, enabling seamless integration with source control systems, testing frameworks, deployment tools, and more.
Deployment and Release Management: While Bitbucket focuses on version control and collaboration, it does not provide built-in deployment and release management capabilities. Jenkins, on the other hand, excels in automating deployment processes. It supports various deployment strategies, including continuous delivery and continuous deployment, enabling developers to automate the release of their applications to different environments.

In summary, Bitbucket is a version control system that emphasizes code management, collaboration, and versioning, while Jenkins is an automation server that specializes in continuous integration and delivery. Bitbucket is essential for managing source code, while Jenkins focuses on automating build, test, and deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Jenkins

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Jenkins
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 24.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 9.2K
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 59.2K
Followers 33.4K	Followers 50.4K
Votes 2.8K	Votes 2.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Jenkins?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

Version Control vs. Continuous Integration: Bitbucket is primarily a web-based version control system that offers distributed version control using Git or Mercurial. It provides features such as repository management, code collaboration, and pull requests. On the other hand, Jenkins is a powerful automation server that focuses on continuous integration and delivery. It allows developers to automate the build, test, and deployment processes of their software projects.
Source Code Management vs. Build Automation: Bitbucket provides features for managing source code, including versioning, branching, and merging. It also offers code reviews, branch permissions, and integrations with issue-tracking tools. Jenkins, on the other hand, focuses on build automation and orchestrating various stages of the software development lifecycle. It can integrate with version control systems like Bitbucket to trigger builds, run tests, and deploy applications.
Web-based Interface vs. Build Pipeline: Bitbucket offers a user-friendly web-based interface for managing repositories, reviewing code changes, and collaborating with team members. It provides a centralized platform for developers to work on their code and collaborate effectively. Jenkins, on the other hand, offers a build pipeline approach where developers define a series of build and deployment steps, allowing for more complex and customizable workflows. Jenkins provides a web-based interface for configuring and monitoring pipelines.
Integration and Extensibility: Bitbucket integrates with development tools like issue trackers, continuous integration servers, and project management tools, offering a marketplace for extending its features with plugins. Jenkins, as an automation server, has extensive integration capabilities through plugins, enabling seamless integration with source control systems, testing frameworks, deployment tools, and more.
Deployment and Release Management: While Bitbucket focuses on version control and collaboration, it does not provide built-in deployment and release management capabilities. Jenkins, on the other hand, excels in automating deployment processes. It supports various deployment strategies, including continuous delivery and continuous deployment, enabling developers to automate the release of their applications to different environments.

Bitbucket vs Jenkins