Bitbucket vs Buildbot: What are the differences?
Developers describe Bitbucket as "One place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private repositories". Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users. On the other hand, Buildbot is detailed as "Python-based continuous integration testing framework". BuildBot is a system to automate the compile/test cycle required by most software projects to validate code changes. By automatically rebuilding and testing the tree each time something has changed, build problems are pinpointed quickly, before other developers are inconvenienced by the failure.
Bitbucket can be classified as a tool in the "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category, while Buildbot is grouped under "Continuous Integration".
Some of the features offered by Bitbucket are:
- Unlimited private repositories, charged per user
- Best-in-class Jira integration
- Built-in CI/CD
On the other hand, Buildbot provides the following key features:
- run builds on a variety of slave platforms
- arbitrary build process: handles projects using C, Python, whatever
- minimal host requirements: Python and Twisted
"Free private repos" is the top reason why over 896 developers like Bitbucket, while over 8 developers mention "Highly configurable builds" as the leading cause for choosing Buildbot.
Buildbot is an open source tool with 4K GitHub stars and 1.37K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Buildbot's open source repository on GitHub.
PayPal, Salesforce, and CircleCI are some of the popular companies that use Bitbucket, whereas Buildbot is used by Mozilla, Animoto, and Fetch Robotics. Bitbucket has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1750 company stacks & 1492 developers stacks; compared to Buildbot, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.
