Apache Maven vs Bamboo

Overview

Apache Maven

Stacks3.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes414

GitHub Stars4.8K

Forks2.8K

Bamboo

Stacks504

Followers549

Votes17

Apache Maven vs Bamboo: What are the differences?

Build Tool vs CI/CD Tool: Apache Maven is primarily a build automation tool that focuses on compiling source code, packaging, and managing dependencies, while Bamboo is a comprehensive CI/CD tool that automates the entire software development lifecycle including building, testing, and deploying applications.
Configuration Language: Maven uses XML-based configuration for defining project structures and build processes, whereas Bamboo provides a user-friendly graphical interface for configuring and managing build plans, making it easier for non-technical users to work with.
Integration Capabilities: Maven integrates seamlessly with other build tools and CI servers, providing flexibility in setting up different development environments, whereas Bamboo is tightly integrated with Atlassian's suite of tools such as Jira, Bitbucket, and Confluence, offering a cohesive ecosystem for development teams.
Extensibility and Plugins: Maven offers a vast repository of plugins for extending its functionality and supporting various build tasks, while Bamboo provides limited extensibility options mainly through custom scripts and third-party plugins, potentially limiting its adaptability to specific project requirements.
Monitoring and Reporting: Bamboo provides real-time monitoring of build and deployment activities with detailed reports and notifications on build success/failure, facilitating quick identification and resolution of issues, whereas Maven lacks built-in monitoring features and relies on external tools for performance tracking and reporting.
Ease of Use: Maven is more developer-centric and may require a steeper learning curve due to its configuration-heavy nature, while Bamboo is designed for ease of use with a user-friendly interface and intuitive workflows, making it more accessible to non-technical team members for managing CI/CD processes.

In Summary, Apache Maven is a build automation tool focused on compiling source code and managing dependencies, while Bamboo is a comprehensive CI/CD tool with seamless integration capabilities and user-friendly interface for automating the software development lifecycle.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven	Bamboo
Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.	Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 3.4K	Stacks 504
Followers 1.7K	Followers 549
Votes 414	Votes 17
Pros & Cons
Pros 138 Dependency management 70 Necessary evil 60 I’d rather code my app, not my build 48 Publishing packaged artifacts 43 Convention over configuration Cons 6 Complex 1 Inconsistent buillds 0 Not many plugin-alternatives	Pros 10 Integrates with other Atlassian tools 4 Great notification scheme 2 Great UI 1 Has Deployment Projects Cons 6 Expensive 1 Bad integration with docker 1 Bad UI 1 Low community support
Integrations
No integrations available	Confluence Jira Bitbucket HipChat

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, Bamboo?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Related Comparisons

Apache Maven vs Bamboo: What are the differences?

Build Tool vs CI/CD Tool: Apache Maven is primarily a build automation tool that focuses on compiling source code, packaging, and managing dependencies, while Bamboo is a comprehensive CI/CD tool that automates the entire software development lifecycle including building, testing, and deploying applications.
Configuration Language: Maven uses XML-based configuration for defining project structures and build processes, whereas Bamboo provides a user-friendly graphical interface for configuring and managing build plans, making it easier for non-technical users to work with.
Integration Capabilities: Maven integrates seamlessly with other build tools and CI servers, providing flexibility in setting up different development environments, whereas Bamboo is tightly integrated with Atlassian's suite of tools such as Jira, Bitbucket, and Confluence, offering a cohesive ecosystem for development teams.
Extensibility and Plugins: Maven offers a vast repository of plugins for extending its functionality and supporting various build tasks, while Bamboo provides limited extensibility options mainly through custom scripts and third-party plugins, potentially limiting its adaptability to specific project requirements.
Monitoring and Reporting: Bamboo provides real-time monitoring of build and deployment activities with detailed reports and notifications on build success/failure, facilitating quick identification and resolution of issues, whereas Maven lacks built-in monitoring features and relies on external tools for performance tracking and reporting.
Ease of Use: Maven is more developer-centric and may require a steeper learning curve due to its configuration-heavy nature, while Bamboo is designed for ease of use with a user-friendly interface and intuitive workflows, making it more accessible to non-technical team members for managing CI/CD processes.

Apache Maven vs Bamboo

Overview