StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservice Catalog
  5. Backstage.io vs Port

Backstage.io vs Port

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Backstage.io
Backstage.io
Stacks71
Followers88
Votes0
GitHub Stars31.7K
Forks6.9K
Port
Port
Stacks31
Followers42
Votes0

Backstage.io vs Port: What are the differences?

Introduction

Backstage.io and Port are two popular software solutions that help organizations manage their software development lifecycle. While both offer similar functionality, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: Backstage.io is built on a microservices architecture, allowing for better scalability and flexibility. Port, on the other hand, follows a monolithic architecture, which can limit scalability and make it harder to introduce new features or changes.

  2. Extensibility: Backstage.io is highly extensible and allows users to easily develop plugins and integrations with other development tools. This enables organizations to customize and extend the functionality of Backstage.io to meet their specific needs. Port, on the other hand, has limited extensibility options and does not provide the same level of flexibility for customization.

  3. Community and Support: Backstage.io has a larger and more active community compared to Port. This means that there is a wealth of resources, documentation, and community support available for Backstage.io users. Port, while still supported, has a smaller community, resulting in fewer resources and less community support.

  4. Integration Capabilities: Backstage.io has extensive integration capabilities with various tools and services, allowing users to seamlessly connect their existing development tools and workflows. Port, while it does offer integrations, has a more limited set of supported integrations, which may be a limitation for organizations with specific integration requirements.

  5. User Interface and User Experience: Backstage.io provides a modern and intuitive user interface, with features such as a customizable dashboard and search functionality. Port, while functional, may have a less polished user interface and user experience, which can impact usability and productivity.

  6. Maturity and Adoption: Backstage.io has gained significant traction and is used by several high-profile companies, indicating its maturity and wide adoption within the software development community. Port, while a solid software solution, may have a smaller user base and less industry recognition.

In summary, Backstage.io offers a more scalable and extensible architecture, a larger community for support, extensive integration capabilities, a modern user interface, and wider industry adoption compared to Port.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Backstage.io
Backstage.io
Port
Port

It is an open platform for building developer portals. Powered by a centralized service catalog, it restores order to your microservices and infrastructure and enables your product teams to ship high-quality code quickly — without compromising autonomy.

It is a Developer Platform made to make life easier for developers and DevOps in an organization, by creating a single platform that acts as a single source of truth for all of the infrastructure assets and operations existing in the organization's tech stack. Port then allows developers to perform self-service actions on these assets. From provisioning a dev environment, understanding who is the owner of a microservice, or any unique use case DevOps wants to self-serve and automate.

Manage all your software, all in one place; A uniform overview; Metadata on tap; Not just services; Discoverability & accountability
A comprehensive Software Catalog that includes all your software and infrastructure components in one place: microservices, monoliths, deployments, repos, databases, and more; Self-service for your developers that enables them to provision, terminate, and perform day 2 operations on any asset in your catalog
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
71
Stacks
31
Followers
88
Followers
42
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Datadog
Datadog
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
Google Analytics
Google Analytics
LDAP
LDAP
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
GitHub
GitHub
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Backstage.io, Port?

Cortex

Cortex

It helps engineering teams understand and improve their services. By aggregating data from tools like Datadog and Okta, It helps teams understand their architecture at a glance – everything from ownership to runbooks.

Configure8

Configure8

Help your developers move faster and build better software with self-serve access to the knowledge and functionality they need with configure8, an enterprise-grade internal developer portal and platform orchestrator.

OpsLevel

OpsLevel

With OpsLevel, developers can self-serve key actions in the software lifecycle, and platform teams can ensure best practices and standards are baked into everything from the start.

Effx

Effx

It is the simplest way to navigate and operate your microservices. It provides relief for developers looking for a better understanding of their microservice architectures.

Atlassian Compass

Atlassian Compass

It is a developer experience platform that brings your distributed software architecture and the teams collaborating on it together in a single, unified place.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana