StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Azure Storage vs Kafka

Azure Storage vs Kafka

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K
Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Stacks1.3K
Followers787
Votes52

Azure Storage vs Kafka: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Storage and Kafka are two popular technologies used for data storage and processing. While Azure Storage is a cloud-based storage service provided by Microsoft Azure, Kafka is a distributed streaming platform. Both have different features and use cases, making them suitable for different scenarios.

  1. Data storage vs. Streaming platform: The key difference between Azure Storage and Kafka is their primary purpose. Azure Storage is primarily used for data storage, providing scalable and secure storage solutions for various types of data, including blobs, tables, queues, and files. On the other hand, Kafka is a distributed messaging system designed for handling real-time streaming data. It provides a reliable and scalable platform for real-time data processing and analysis.

  2. Data processing: Another significant difference between Azure Storage and Kafka is their approach to data processing. Azure Storage is a passive storage solution where data is stored and retrieved as needed. It does not provide built-in data processing capabilities. In contrast, Kafka is designed for event-driven data processing, enabling real-time processing and analysis of streaming data. It allows for the seamless integration of data from diverse sources and enables the creation of real-time data pipelines.

  3. Scalability: When it comes to scalability, both Azure Storage and Kafka have their approaches. Azure Storage provides scalable storage solutions with the ability to horizontally scale by adding more storage resources. It can handle large volumes of data and provides high availability and durability. On the other hand, Kafka offers horizontal scalability by distributing data across multiple partitions and brokers. It can handle high message throughput and provide fault-tolerance and scalability.

  4. Data persistence: Azure Storage provides durable and reliable storage for data, ensuring data availability even in the event of hardware failures. It uses replication techniques to maintain data redundancy and offers different storage tiers with varying levels of durability and cost. Kafka, on the other hand, provides fault-tolerance and persistence by replicating data across multiple brokers. It ensures that data is persisted and replicated even in the event of broker failures.

  5. Data retention: Azure Storage allows users to retain data for long periods, making it suitable for archival and compliance purposes. It provides different storage tiers with varying retention periods, allowing users to store data for months or years. Kafka, on the other hand, is designed for real-time data processing and typically does not retain data for extended periods. It focuses on processing and streaming data in near real-time rather than long-term storage.

  6. Data integration and data flow: Azure Storage integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, making it easy to build data pipelines and workflows. It provides integration with various tools and services for data processing and analytics. Kafka, on the other hand, acts as a central data hub, enabling the integration of diverse data sources and systems. It allows for the flow of data between different components of an application or a distributed system.

In summary, Azure Storage is a cloud-based storage service primarily used for data storage, while Kafka is a distributed streaming platform designed for real-time data processing and analysis. Azure Storage provides durable and scalable storage solutions, whereas Kafka offers fault-tolerant messaging and real-time data streaming capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kafka, Azure Storage

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.9k views10.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kafka
Kafka
Azure Storage
Azure Storage

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Blobs, Tables, Queues, and Files;Highly scalable;Durable & highly available;Premium Storage;Designed for developers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
14.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24.2K
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
22.3K
Followers
787
Votes
607
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
Pros
  • 24
    All-in-one storage solution
  • 15
    Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
  • 9
    Shared drive mapping
  • 2
    Cheapest hot and cloud storage
  • 2
    Cost-effective
Cons
  • 2
    Direct support is not provided by Azure storage
Integrations
No integrations available
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure

What are some alternatives to Kafka, Azure Storage?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase