Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Azure Storage

1.1K
787
+ 1
52
Celery

1.6K
1.6K
+ 1
280
Add tool

Azure Storage vs Celery: What are the differences?

Azure Storage and Celery are two different technologies used in the development of web applications. While Azure Storage is a service provided by Microsoft Azure for storing different types of data, Celery is a distributed task queue system.

  1. Scalability: Azure Storage is highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data without compromising performance. It provides features like automatic scaling, geo-replication, and load balancing. On the other hand, Celery is designed for distributing tasks across multiple workers, allowing applications to scale horizontally by adding more workers as needed.

  2. Data Types: Azure Storage supports various data types such as blobs, tables, queues, and files, providing different ways to store and retrieve data. It offers built-in features for managing large amounts of structured and unstructured data. In contrast, Celery focuses primarily on managing and distributing tasks among workers, with less emphasis on specific data types.

  3. Integration: Azure Storage is tightly integrated with other services provided by Microsoft Azure, such as Azure Functions, Azure Logic Apps, and Azure Databricks. It can be easily used as a storage solution for these services. On the other hand, Celery can be integrated with various frameworks and technologies, providing flexibility in the choice of tools and libraries.

  4. Message Brokering: Celery utilizes a message broker to handle task distribution among workers. It supports multiple message brokers like RabbitMQ, Redis, and Amazon SQS. This allows applications to use different message brokers based on their specific requirements. Azure Storage, on the other hand, does not provide built-in message brokering capabilities, as it is primarily focused on data storage.

  5. Monitoring and Management: Azure Storage provides comprehensive monitoring and management tools, allowing users to track the performance, usage, and availability of their storage accounts. It offers features like Azure Monitor, Azure Resource Manager, and Azure Storage Explorer. In contrast, Celery does not have built-in monitoring and management tools, but it can be integrated with third-party tools for this purpose.

  6. Pricing Model: Azure Storage follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the amount of storage used and the operations performed on the data. The pricing is flexible and allows users to choose different levels of performance and durability. Celery, being an open-source technology, does not have a specific pricing model. However, users might incur costs related to the infrastructure required to run Celery workers and message brokers.

In Summary, Azure Storage is a scalable and versatile data storage solution tightly integrated with other Azure services, while Celery is a distributed task queue system that focuses on task distribution among workers.

Advice on Azure Storage and Celery
Needs advice
on
CeleryCelery
and
RabbitMQRabbitMQ

I am just a beginner at these two technologies.

Problem statement: I am getting lakh of users from the sequel server for whom I need to create caches in MongoDB by making different REST API requests.

Here these users can be treated as messages. Each REST API request is a task.

I am confused about whether I should go for RabbitMQ alone or Celery.

If I have to go with RabbitMQ, I prefer to use python with Pika module. But the challenge with Pika is, it is not thread-safe. So I am not finding a way to execute a lakh of API requests in parallel using multiple threads using Pika.

If I have to go with Celery, I don't know how I can achieve better scalability in executing these API requests in parallel.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
rqrqRedisRedis

For large amounts of small tasks and caches I have had good luck with Redis and RQ. I have not personally used celery but I am fairly sure it would scale well, and I have not used RabbitMQ for anything besides communication between services. If you prefer python my suggestions should feel comfortable.

Sorry I do not have a more information

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Azure Storage
Pros of Celery
  • 24
    All-in-one storage solution
  • 15
    Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
  • 9
    Shared drive mapping
  • 2
    Cost-effective
  • 2
    Cheapest hot and cloud storage
  • 99
    Task queue
  • 63
    Python integration
  • 40
    Django integration
  • 30
    Scheduled Task
  • 19
    Publish/subsribe
  • 8
    Various backend broker
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    Great community
  • 5
    Workflow
  • 4
    Free
  • 1
    Dynamic

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Azure Storage
Cons of Celery
  • 2
    Direct support is not provided by Azure storage
  • 4
    Sometimes loses tasks
  • 1
    Depends on broker

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Azure Storage?

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

What is Celery?

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Azure Storage and Celery as a desired skillset
What companies use Azure Storage?
What companies use Celery?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Azure Storage?
What tools integrate with Celery?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitHubPythonNode.js+47
55
73201
JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
53
22493
GitHubPythonSlack+25
7
3331
GitHubPythonDocker+24
13
17237
What are some alternatives to Azure Storage and Celery?
Azure Redis Cache
It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.
Amazon S3
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.
OneDrive
Outlook.com is a free, personal email service from Microsoft. Keep your inbox clutter-free with powerful organizational tools, and collaborate easily with OneDrive and Office Online integration.
Dropbox
Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.
See all alternatives