Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure Service Bus vs Celery: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Azure Service Bus and Celery
Azure Service Bus and Celery are both popular messaging frameworks used for handling asynchronous and distributed tasks. Despite their similarities, there are several key differences between the two:
Architecture and Dependency: Azure Service Bus is a cloud-based messaging service provided by Microsoft Azure, while Celery is an open-source distributed task queue system. Azure Service Bus requires an Azure subscription and is directly integrated with other Azure services, while Celery can be used in any environment and with different message brokers.
Language Support: Azure Service Bus supports various programming languages, including .NET, Java, Python, and Node.js. On the other hand, Celery is primarily used with Python and has extensive support for Python-related tools and frameworks.
Scalability and Performance: Azure Service Bus is highly scalable and can handle a large number of messages at a high throughput. It provides advanced features like message batching, session handling, and dead-lettering. Celery, on the other hand, provides scalability to some extent by using distributed message brokers like RabbitMQ or Redis, but it may not be as scalable as Azure Service Bus in certain scenarios.
Service Offering: Azure Service Bus is a fully managed service provided by Microsoft Azure, which means that the infrastructure and maintenance aspects are taken care of by Azure. Celery, being an open-source framework, requires more configuration and setup effort as it needs to be deployed and maintained by the users themselves.
Monitoring and Management: Azure Service Bus provides extensive monitoring and management capabilities through Azure Portal, such as graphical representations of message rates, queues, and subscriptions. It also integrates with Azure Monitor for alerts and diagnostics. Celery, on the other hand, provides basic monitoring capabilities and logging but may require additional tools or customization for comprehensive monitoring and management.
Cost: Azure Service Bus is a paid service, and the cost is based on message volume, throughput, and other factors. The pricing can vary based on the specific Azure region and the chosen pricing tier. Celery, being open-source, is free to use, but users need to consider the infrastructure and resources required to deploy and maintain their own Celery workers and message brokers.
In summary, Azure Service Bus is a cloud-based, fully managed messaging service provided by Microsoft Azure, offering extensive scalability, advanced features, and integration with other Azure services. Celery, on the other hand, is an open-source task queue system primarily used with Python, providing flexibility and customization options for distributed task processing.
Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?
We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).
Thank you very much in advance :)
There are many different messaging frameworks available for IPC use. It's not really a question of how "new" the technology is, but what you need it to do. Azure Service Bus can be a great service to use, but it can also take a lot of effort to administrate and maintain that can make it costly to use unless you need the more advanced features it offers for routing, sequencing, delivery, etc. I would recommend checking out this link to get a basic idea of different messaging architectures. These only cover Azure services, but there are many other solutions that use similar architectural models.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/event-grid/compare-messaging-services
Pros of Azure Service Bus
- Easy Integration with .Net4
- Cloud Native2
- Use while high messaging need1
Pros of Celery
- Task queue99
- Python integration63
- Django integration40
- Scheduled Task30
- Publish/subsribe19
- Various backend broker8
- Easy to use6
- Great community5
- Workflow5
- Free4
- Dynamic1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure Service Bus
- Limited features in Basic tier1
- Skills can only be used in Azure - vendor lock-in1
- Lacking in JMS support1
- Observability of messages in the queue is lacking1
Cons of Celery
- Sometimes loses tasks4
- Depends on broker1