Azure Functions vs Hangfire

Overview

Hangfire

Stacks333

Followers249

Votes17

GitHub Stars9.9K

Forks1.7K

Azure Functions

Stacks785

Followers705

Votes62

Azure Functions vs Hangfire: What are the differences?

In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between Azure Functions and Hangfire.

Scalability: Azure Functions is a serverless computing service provided by Microsoft, which automatically scales based on the number of incoming requests. On the other hand, Hangfire is a background job processing library that relies on a dedicated server or cluster for handling job queues. This means that Azure Functions can handle a higher volume of requests and scale more easily, making it a more suitable choice for applications with unpredictable workloads.
Event-driven vs Schedule-driven: Azure Functions is event-driven, meaning it gets triggered by specific events such as an HTTP request, a message in a queue, or a timer. Hangfire, on the other hand, relies on scheduling recurring jobs or creating jobs manually. This makes Hangfire a better choice for applications that require tasks to be executed at specific times or intervals, while Azure Functions is more suitable for on-demand processing.
Pricing Model: Azure Functions follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you pay only for the actual usage of resources. Hangfire, on the other hand, is open-source and free to use, but you need to manage and provision your own infrastructure for running Hangfire servers. This makes Azure Functions a more convenient option for small-scale applications, while Hangfire allows more control but requires additional setup and management.
Integration and Ecosystem: Azure Functions has deep integration with other Azure services, such as Azure Storage, Azure Event Grid, and Azure Logic Apps. It also supports a wide variety of triggers and bindings that make it easy to connect and interact with external systems. Hangfire, being a library, can be integrated with any .NET application but doesn't have the same level of seamless integration with cloud services as Azure Functions.
Development Experience: Azure Functions provides a rich development experience with built-in support for multiple programming languages like C#, JavaScript, Java, and Python. It also offers testing and debugging capabilities within the Azure portal. Hangfire, being a library, requires manual setup and configuration as well as writing code to handle jobs and scheduling.
Serverless Architecture vs Dedicated Servers: Azure Functions is built on a serverless architecture, meaning there is no need to manage or provision servers. It abstracts away the infrastructure management and allows developers to focus on writing code. Hangfire, on the other hand, requires dedicated servers or a cluster to handle job queues. This means that Azure Functions can be more cost-effective and efficient in terms of resource utilization.

In Summary, Azure Functions and Hangfire differ in terms of scalability, trigger mechanisms, pricing model, integration and ecosystem, development experience, and underlying architecture. Azure Functions is a serverless computing service that scales automatically, event-driven, and follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, while Hangfire is a background job processing library that relies on manual scheduling, requires dedicated servers, and is free to use but requires additional setup and management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hangfire	Azure Functions
It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.	Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.
-	Easily schedule event-driven tasks across services;Expose Functions as HTTP API endpoints;Scale Functions based on customer demand;Develop how you want, using a browser-based UI or existing tools;Get continuous deployment, remote debugging, and authentication out of the box
Statistics
GitHub Stars 9.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 333	Stacks 785
Followers 249	Followers 705
Votes 17	Votes 62
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Integrated UI dashboard 5 Simple 3 Robust 2 In Memory 0 Simole	Pros 14 Pay only when invoked 11 Great developer experience for C# 9 Multiple languages supported 7 Great debugging support 5 Can be used as lightweight https service Cons 1 Sporadic server & language runtime issues 1 Not suited for long-running applications 1 No persistent (writable) file system available 1 Poor support for Linux environments
Integrations
No integrations available	Azure DevOps Java Bitbucket Node.js Microsoft Azure GitHub Visual Studio Code JavaScript Azure Cosmos DB C#

What are some alternatives to Hangfire, Azure Functions?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

Related Comparisons

Azure Functions vs Hangfire: What are the differences?

In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between Azure Functions and Hangfire.

Scalability: Azure Functions is a serverless computing service provided by Microsoft, which automatically scales based on the number of incoming requests. On the other hand, Hangfire is a background job processing library that relies on a dedicated server or cluster for handling job queues. This means that Azure Functions can handle a higher volume of requests and scale more easily, making it a more suitable choice for applications with unpredictable workloads.
Event-driven vs Schedule-driven: Azure Functions is event-driven, meaning it gets triggered by specific events such as an HTTP request, a message in a queue, or a timer. Hangfire, on the other hand, relies on scheduling recurring jobs or creating jobs manually. This makes Hangfire a better choice for applications that require tasks to be executed at specific times or intervals, while Azure Functions is more suitable for on-demand processing.
Pricing Model: Azure Functions follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you pay only for the actual usage of resources. Hangfire, on the other hand, is open-source and free to use, but you need to manage and provision your own infrastructure for running Hangfire servers. This makes Azure Functions a more convenient option for small-scale applications, while Hangfire allows more control but requires additional setup and management.
Integration and Ecosystem: Azure Functions has deep integration with other Azure services, such as Azure Storage, Azure Event Grid, and Azure Logic Apps. It also supports a wide variety of triggers and bindings that make it easy to connect and interact with external systems. Hangfire, being a library, can be integrated with any .NET application but doesn't have the same level of seamless integration with cloud services as Azure Functions.
Development Experience: Azure Functions provides a rich development experience with built-in support for multiple programming languages like C#, JavaScript, Java, and Python. It also offers testing and debugging capabilities within the Azure portal. Hangfire, being a library, requires manual setup and configuration as well as writing code to handle jobs and scheduling.
Serverless Architecture vs Dedicated Servers: Azure Functions is built on a serverless architecture, meaning there is no need to manage or provision servers. It abstracts away the infrastructure management and allows developers to focus on writing code. Hangfire, on the other hand, requires dedicated servers or a cluster to handle job queues. This means that Azure Functions can be more cost-effective and efficient in terms of resource utilization.

Azure Functions vs Hangfire

Overview