Azure API Management vs Ocelot

Overview

Ocelot

Stacks83

Followers283

Votes4

GitHub Stars8.6K

Forks1.7K

Azure API Management

Stacks69

Followers87

Votes0

Azure API Management vs Ocelot: What are the differences?

Key difference 1: Authentication and Authorization: Azure API Management provides built-in capabilities for authentication and authorization, allowing you to control access to your APIs based on user identity, client application, or subscription. Ocelot, on the other hand, does not have built-in authentication and authorization capabilities and relies on external authentication mechanisms such as IdentityServer or custom middleware.
Key difference 2: Traffic Management: Azure API Management offers advanced traffic management features like rate limiting, IP filtering, and caching, allowing you to manage and control the traffic to your APIs. Ocelot, though it supports basic load balancing and routing, does not provide as extensive traffic management capabilities as Azure API Management.
Key difference 3: Developer Portal: Azure API Management includes a developer portal that allows developers to discover, explore, and consume your APIs. The developer portal provides features like API documentation, testing console, and subscription management. Ocelot does not have a built-in developer portal and requires additional tools or custom development for documentation and API consumption.
Key difference 4: API Versioning: Azure API Management provides native support for API versioning, allowing you to manage different versions of your APIs and handle versioning-related issues. Ocelot, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for API versioning and requires custom configuration or middleware for handling different API versions.
Key difference 5: Analytics and Monitoring: Azure API Management offers extensive analytics and monitoring capabilities, allowing you to track and monitor the usage, performance, and health of your APIs. It provides pre-built reports and dashboards for API analytics. Ocelot does not provide built-in analytics and monitoring capabilities and requires integration with external tools or logging frameworks for monitoring and analytics.
Key difference 6: Deployment and Management: With Azure API Management, you can easily deploy and manage your APIs in a scalable and distributed manner by leveraging Azure's infrastructure and services. It provides features like automatic scaling, high availability, and seamless integration with Azure services. Ocelot, being a lightweight API gateway, requires manual deployment and management, and does not offer the same level of scalability and integration with cloud infrastructure as Azure API Management.

In Summary, Azure API Management offers out-of-the-box features for authentication, traffic management, developer portal, API versioning, analytics, and easy deployment, whereas Ocelot lacks these built-in capabilities and requires additional tools or custom development for similar functionality.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ocelot	Azure API Management
It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.	Today's innovative enterprises are adopting API architectures to accelerate growth. Streamline your work across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with a single place for managing all your APIs.
Routing; Request Aggregation; Service Discovery with Consul & Eureka; Service Fabric; Kubernetes; WebSockets; Authentication; Authorisation; Rate Limiting; Caching	Help protect your resources; Accelerate your business; Improve API discoverability; Transform your existing services; Help secure your APIs
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 83	Stacks 69
Followers 283	Followers 87
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Straightforward documentation 2 Simple configuration	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GraphQL .NET ASP.NET .NET Core	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Ocelot, Azure API Management?

Kong

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.

Tyk Cloud

Tyk is a leading Open Source API Gateway and Management Platform, featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. We power billions of transactions for thousands of innovative organisations.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

Related Comparisons

Azure API Management vs Ocelot: What are the differences?

Key difference 1: Authentication and Authorization: Azure API Management provides built-in capabilities for authentication and authorization, allowing you to control access to your APIs based on user identity, client application, or subscription. Ocelot, on the other hand, does not have built-in authentication and authorization capabilities and relies on external authentication mechanisms such as IdentityServer or custom middleware.
Key difference 2: Traffic Management: Azure API Management offers advanced traffic management features like rate limiting, IP filtering, and caching, allowing you to manage and control the traffic to your APIs. Ocelot, though it supports basic load balancing and routing, does not provide as extensive traffic management capabilities as Azure API Management.
Key difference 3: Developer Portal: Azure API Management includes a developer portal that allows developers to discover, explore, and consume your APIs. The developer portal provides features like API documentation, testing console, and subscription management. Ocelot does not have a built-in developer portal and requires additional tools or custom development for documentation and API consumption.
Key difference 4: API Versioning: Azure API Management provides native support for API versioning, allowing you to manage different versions of your APIs and handle versioning-related issues. Ocelot, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for API versioning and requires custom configuration or middleware for handling different API versions.
Key difference 5: Analytics and Monitoring: Azure API Management offers extensive analytics and monitoring capabilities, allowing you to track and monitor the usage, performance, and health of your APIs. It provides pre-built reports and dashboards for API analytics. Ocelot does not provide built-in analytics and monitoring capabilities and requires integration with external tools or logging frameworks for monitoring and analytics.
Key difference 6: Deployment and Management: With Azure API Management, you can easily deploy and manage your APIs in a scalable and distributed manner by leveraging Azure's infrastructure and services. It provides features like automatic scaling, high availability, and seamless integration with Azure services. Ocelot, being a lightweight API gateway, requires manual deployment and management, and does not offer the same level of scalability and integration with cloud infrastructure as Azure API Management.

Azure API Management vs Ocelot

Overview