StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Jenkins

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
Stacks12.8K
Followers8.8K
Votes59

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Jenkins

Introduction:

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and Jenkins are both popular tools used in website development and deployment. While ELB is a service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) for distributing incoming application traffic across multiple targets, Jenkins is an open-source automation server used for continuous integration and delivery of software projects.

1. Scalability and Availability: ELB is designed to automatically distribute incoming traffic across multiple instances, helping to achieve high availability of applications. It can seamlessly scale with the increase in traffic and can handle traffic spikes efficiently. On the other hand, Jenkins focuses on automating the development and deployment process rather than directly managing the scalability and availability aspects.

2. Traffic Routing and Load Distribution: ELB provides advanced traffic routing capabilities, allowing users to configure rules based on various parameters like path patterns, host headers, and query strings. It supports different load balancing algorithms to evenly distribute traffic across instances. Jenkins, on the other hand, primarily focuses on automating the build, test, and deployment process and does not provide built-in traffic routing or load balancing capabilities.

3. Deployment and Infrastructure Management: ELB simplifies the deployment process by automatically distributing traffic across multiple instances, making it easy to manage and monitor applications. It integrates well with other AWS services like Auto Scaling and CloudWatch, providing a comprehensive infrastructure management solution. In contrast, Jenkins is primarily focused on automation and does not offer the same level of infrastructure management capabilities as ELB.

4. User Interface and Usability: ELB provides a user-friendly web interface as part of the AWS Management Console, making it easy for users to configure and manage load balancers. It offers a simple and intuitive interface for setting up routing rules, monitoring traffic, and managing instances. Jenkins, on the other hand, is a self-hosted automation server that provides a web-based UI for managing Jenkins jobs and configurations. While Jenkins offers flexibility and customization options, it may require more technical expertise to set up and configure compared to ELB.

5. Cost and Pricing Model: ELB is billed based on the amount of data processed and the number of load balancer hours used. The pricing is flexible and varies based on factors like the number of instances, traffic volume, and data transfer. On the other hand, Jenkins is an open-source tool, and the cost is mainly associated with the infrastructure required to host the Jenkins server and the resources utilized for running jobs. Jenkins can be run on self-hosted servers or cloud platforms, providing flexibility in terms of cost management.

6. Integration and Extensibility: ELB integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Auto Scaling, AWS Certificate Manager, and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), providing a holistic solution for managing and scaling applications. It also offers APIs and SDKs for programmatic access and extensibility. Jenkins, being an open-source project, has a wide range of plugins and integrations available for various tools and technologies, making it highly customizable and extensible.

In summary, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) provides scalable and highly available load balancing and routing capabilities with a comprehensive infrastructure management solution, while Jenkins is focused on automating the development and deployment process through continuous integration and delivery. ELB offers advanced traffic routing, scalability, and integration with other AWS services, while Jenkins provides flexibility, customization, and extensibility through plugins and extensive community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Distribution of requests to Amazon EC2 instances (servers) in multiple Availability Zones so that the risk of overloading one single instance is minimized. And if an entire Availability Zone goes offline, Elastic Load Balancing routes traffic to instances in other Availability Zones.;Continuous monitoring of the health of Amazon EC2 instances registered with the load balancer so that requests are sent only to the healthy instances. If an instance becomes unhealthy, Elastic Load Balancing stops sending traffic to that instance and spreads the load across the remaining healthy instances.;Support for end-to-end traffic encryption on those networks that use secure (HTTPS/SSL) connections.;The ability to take over the encryption and decryption work from the Amazon EC2 instances, and manage it centrally on the load balancer.;Support for the sticky session feature, which is the ability to "stick" user sessions to specific Amazon EC2 instances.;Association of the load balancer with your domain name. Because the load balancer is the only computer that is exposed to the Internet, you don’t have to create and manage public domain names for the instances that the load balancer manages. You can point the instance's domain records at the load balancer instead and scale as needed (either adding or removing capacity) without having to update the records with each scaling activity.;When used in an Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC), support for creation and management of security groups associated with your load balancer to provide additional networking and security options.;Supports use of both the Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) and Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6).
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
12.8K
Followers
50.4K
Followers
8.8K
Votes
2.2K
Votes
59
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 48
    Easy
  • 8
    ASG integration
  • 2
    Reliability
  • 1
    Coding
  • 0
    SSL offloading
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana