StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. AWS CodePipeline vs Apache Maven

AWS CodePipeline vs Apache Maven

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Stacks3.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes414
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks2.8K
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Stacks551
Followers933
Votes30

AWS CodePipeline vs Apache Maven: What are the differences?

Introduction:
AWS CodePipeline and Apache Maven are both popular tools in the software development industry, but they have key differences that set them apart.

1. **Use Case**: AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and delivery service that automates the testing and deployment of code to infrastructure. It is primarily used for building, testing, and deploying code in AWS cloud environments. On the other hand, Apache Maven is a build automation tool used primarily for building and managing Java projects. It helps in managing project dependencies and automating the build process.

2. **Integration**: AWS CodePipeline integrates with various AWS services such as AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodeCommit, and AWS Elastic Beanstalk to provide end-to-end automation of the software release process within the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Apache Maven integrates with external repositories and plugins to manage project dependencies and automate the build process within the Java ecosystem.

3. **Configuration**: AWS CodePipeline allows users to define their build, test, and deployment stages using a visual interface or AWS CloudFormation templates. Users can configure the pipeline stages and actions through the AWS Management Console. On the flip side, Apache Maven uses XML-based configuration files called POM (Project Object Model) to define project metadata, dependencies, and build configurations. Users can customize the build process by editing the POM file.

4. **Scalability**: AWS CodePipeline offers scalability and high availability as it is a managed service provided by AWS. It can automatically scale to handle a large number of build and deployment workflows simultaneously. In contrast, Apache Maven's scalability depends on the underlying hardware and resources of the system on which it is running. Users may need to set up their own infrastructure to handle large-scale build processes.

5. **Cost**: AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model where users are charged based on the number of pipelines, active months, and usage of associated AWS services. The cost can vary depending on the complexity and scale of the pipeline workflows. On the other hand, Apache Maven is an open-source tool that is free to use without any licensing costs. Users have the freedom to set up Maven on their own infrastructure without incurring additional costs.

6. **Support**: AWS CodePipeline provides technical support and documentation from AWS for troubleshooting and assistance with using the service. Users can also leverage the AWS community and forums for help with any issues. Apache Maven, being an open-source project, relies on community support through forums, mailing lists, and documentation. Users can seek help from the Maven community for any technical challenges they encounter.

In Summary, AWS CodePipeline is a managed service for continuous integration and delivery in the AWS cloud, offering seamless integration with AWS services, visual configuration options, scalability, and pay-as-you-go pricing. On the other hand, Apache Maven is a build automation tool for Java projects, providing flexibility with XML configurations, dependency management, open-source licensing, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.4K
Stacks
551
Followers
1.7K
Followers
933
Votes
414
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
Cons
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives
Pros
  • 13
    Simple to set up
  • 8
    Managed service
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 3
    Parallel Execution
  • 2
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 2
    No project boards
  • 1
    No integration with "Power" 365 tools
Integrations
No integrations available
Runscope
Runscope
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
CloudBees
CloudBees
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, AWS CodePipeline?

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Deployer

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Spinnaker

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana