StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Deployment As A Service
  5. AWS CodeDeploy vs Go.CD

AWS CodeDeploy vs Go.CD

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy
Stacks380
Followers624
Votes38
GoCD
GoCD
Stacks205
Followers325
Votes207
GitHub Stars7.3K
Forks980

AWS CodeDeploy vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS CodeDeploy and Go.CD are both continuous delivery tools used for deploying applications to various environments. While both tools offer similar functionalities, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Architecture: AWS CodeDeploy is a cloud-based deployment service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It operates on a client-server architecture with an agent running on the target instances. In contrast, Go.CD is a server-based deployment tool that uses an agent-based architecture. The Go.CD server coordinates the deployment process, and agents are responsible for executing the deployment tasks.

  2. Integration with Other Services: AWS CodeDeploy seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, such as EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and AWS Elastic Beanstalk. It provides built-in support for AWS CloudFormation and AWS OpsWorks, making it easy to incorporate into existing AWS environments. On the other hand, Go.CD can integrate with a variety of tools and services through its plugin system, offering flexibility for organizations using different technologies and platforms.

  3. Release Management: AWS CodeDeploy primarily focuses on the deployment aspect of continuous delivery. It provides features like blue/green deployments, automatic rollbacks, and deployment lifecycle hooks for more control over the deployment process. Go.CD, on the other hand, offers more comprehensive release management capabilities. It enables defining pipelines, managing dependencies, and facilitating complex release processes, making it suitable for organizations with sophisticated deployment workflows.

  4. Ease of Use: AWS CodeDeploy simplifies the deployment process through its user-friendly console and wizard-driven setup. It offers a straightforward way to define deployment configurations, target instances, and deployment groups. Go.CD, although powerful, has a steeper learning curve. It requires configuration through code using its domain-specific language (DSL) called "GoCD Configuration as Code."

  5. Scalability and Availability: AWS CodeDeploy leverages the scalability and availability of AWS infrastructure, allowing deployments to be scaled up or down with flexibility. It automatically handles instance health checks and load balancing during deployments. Go.CD can scale horizontally by adding multiple agents to handle large-scale deployments, but it doesn't provide the same built-in scalability and availability features as AWS CodeDeploy.

  6. Pricing: AWS CodeDeploy is a pay-as-you-go service, where users only pay for the resources they consume during deployments. The pricing is based on the number of instances being deployed to and the amount of data transferred. Go.CD is an open-source tool with no licensing costs. However, organizations may incur costs for hosting the Go.CD server and maintaining the infrastructure.

In summary, the key differences between AWS CodeDeploy and Go.CD lie in their architecture, integration capabilities, release management features, ease of use, scalability, availability, and pricing models. Organizations should consider their specific requirements and infrastructure environment to choose the most suitable continuous delivery tool.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS CodeDeploy, GoCD

Mohammad Hossein
Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonDockerDocker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy
GoCD
GoCD

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

AWS CodeDeploy fully automates your code deployments, allowing you to deploy reliably and rapidly;AWS CodeDeploy helps maximize your application availability by performing rolling updates across your Amazon EC2 instances and tracking application health according to configurable rules;AWS CodeDeploy allows you to easily launch and track the status of your deployments through the AWS Management Console or the AWS CLI;AWS CodeDeploy is platform and language agnostic and works with any application. You can easily reuse your existing setup code
Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
7.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
980
Stacks
380
Stacks
205
Followers
624
Followers
325
Votes
38
Votes
207
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Automates code deployments
  • 9
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Adds autoscaling lifecycle hooks
  • 5
    Git integration
Pros
  • 32
    Open source
  • 27
    Pipeline dependencies
  • 25
    Pipeline structures
  • 22
    Can run jobs in parallel
  • 20
    Very flexible
Cons
  • 2
    Lack of plugins
  • 2
    Horrible ui
  • 1
    No support
Integrations
CircleCI
CircleCI
Codeship
Codeship
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
Solano CI
Solano CI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Ansible
Ansible
Chef
Chef
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeDeploy, GoCD?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana