StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeDeploy vs CircleCI

AWS CodeDeploy vs CircleCI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CircleCI
CircleCI
Stacks14.5K
Followers7.1K
Votes974
AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy
Stacks380
Followers624
Votes38

AWS CodeDeploy vs CircleCI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS CodeDeploy and CircleCI are both popular tools used in software development for automating deployment processes. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between these tools that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare these differences in detail.

  1. Integration with Cloud Providers: One of the major differences between AWS CodeDeploy and CircleCI is their integration with cloud providers. AWS CodeDeploy is tightly integrated with Amazon Web Services (AWS) and provides seamless deployment capabilities for applications hosted on AWS infrastructure. On the other hand, CircleCI is a general-purpose continuous integration and delivery platform that can be used with any cloud provider or on-premises infrastructure.

  2. Deployment Strategy: Another significant difference between AWS CodeDeploy and CircleCI lies in their deployment strategies. AWS CodeDeploy offers a range of deployment strategies, including rolling updates, blue/green deployments, and canary deployments. These strategies allow for fine-grained control over the deployment process and help minimize downtime. In contrast, CircleCI primarily focuses on continuous integration and provides limited deployment options, usually relying on other tools or scripts for deployment.

  3. Management and Orchestration: AWS CodeDeploy provides comprehensive management and orchestration capabilities for deployment processes. It allows users to define the deployment lifecycle, specify the order in which instances are updated, and provides automatic rollback mechanisms in case of failures. CircleCI, on the other hand, does not offer the same level of management and orchestration features. While it can trigger deployments, it relies on external tools or scripts for managing the deployment process.

  4. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS CodeDeploy is designed to seamlessly handle deployments for large-scale applications and can scale according to the needs of the infrastructure. It offers built-in features like auto-scaling groups and can integrate with load balancers for efficient deployment of changes. CircleCI, being a general-purpose CI/CD platform, provides more flexibility in terms of application and infrastructure choices. It can be used to deploy applications of any size and can adapt to different deployment scenarios.

  5. Workflow and Pipelines: AWS CodeDeploy provides a structured workflow for deploying applications, which involves various stages like application revision, deployment group, and deployment configuration. It supports the creation of deployment pipelines, allowing for the automation of the entire release process. CircleCI, on the other hand, focuses on continuous integration and does not provide the same level of workflow and pipeline automation capabilities as AWS CodeDeploy. It can be used as part of a more comprehensive CI/CD pipeline but may require additional tools and configurations.

  6. Pricing Model: When it comes to pricing, AWS CodeDeploy follows a pay-as-you-go model, where users are charged based on the number of instances they deploy to. It offers a free tier for small-scale deployments but can become expensive for larger applications. CircleCI, on the other hand, offers different pricing plans based on the number of containers, runners, and parallelism needed. It provides flexibility in terms of pricing, allowing users to choose the plan that best suits their needs.

In summary, AWS CodeDeploy is tightly integrated with AWS infrastructure, offers advanced deployment strategies, comprehensive management and orchestration capabilities, and focus on scalability and large-scale deployments. On the other hand, CircleCI is a general-purpose CI/CD platform that can be used with any cloud provider, provides flexibility in terms of workflow and infrastructure choices, and offers a different pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CircleCI, AWS CodeDeploy

Dustin
Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

ReviewonCircleCICircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k
Comments
Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI
CircleCI
AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights
AWS CodeDeploy fully automates your code deployments, allowing you to deploy reliably and rapidly;AWS CodeDeploy helps maximize your application availability by performing rolling updates across your Amazon EC2 instances and tracking application health according to configurable rules;AWS CodeDeploy allows you to easily launch and track the status of your deployments through the AWS Management Console or the AWS CLI;AWS CodeDeploy is platform and language agnostic and works with any application. You can easily reuse your existing setup code
Statistics
Stacks
14.5K
Stacks
380
Followers
7.1K
Followers
624
Votes
974
Votes
38
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 226
    Github integration
  • 177
    Easy setup
  • 153
    Fast builds
  • 94
    Competitively priced
  • 74
    Slack integration
Cons
  • 12
    Unstable
  • 6
    Scammy pricing structure
  • 0
    Aggressive Github permissions
Pros
  • 17
    Automates code deployments
  • 9
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Adds autoscaling lifecycle hooks
  • 5
    Git integration
Integrations
dotCloud
dotCloud
GitHub
GitHub
Xcode
Xcode
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Slack
Slack
Heroku
Heroku
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Codeship
Codeship
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
Solano CI
Solano CI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Ansible
Ansible
Chef
Chef
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
Salt
Salt

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, AWS CodeDeploy?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana