StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. AWS CodeDeploy vs Beanstalk

AWS CodeDeploy vs Beanstalk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Beanstalk
Beanstalk
Stacks85
Followers270
Votes51
AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy
Stacks380
Followers624
Votes38

AWS CodeDeploy vs Beanstalk: What are the differences?

AWS CodeDeploy and AWS Elastic Beanstalk are two popular deployment services provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Deployment Approach: AWS CodeDeploy follows a custom deployment approach where you have more control over your deployment process. It automates the application deployment to a fleet of EC2 instances or on-premises instances. In contrast, AWS Elastic Beanstalk follows a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) approach where the platform handles the deployment and management for you. You simply upload your application code, and Elastic Beanstalk takes care of the deployment details.

  2. Application Configuration: In CodeDeploy, you have fine-grained control over the deployment process as you can define specific deployment configurations and scripts. You can specify the deployment strategy, such as rolling updates or blue/green deployments, and customize the deployment process with hooks and scripts. On the other hand, Elastic Beanstalk abstracts the underlying infrastructure and application stack, providing a simplified configuration experience. You focus on your application code and can easily scale or configure your environment using Elastic Beanstalk's simple configuration options.

  3. Environment and Infrastructure Management: CodeDeploy provides a lightweight solution focused primarily on deployment. It does not manage the underlying environment or infrastructure for you. On the other hand, Elastic Beanstalk handles not only the deployment but also the management of the environment and infrastructure. It automatically provisions and manages all the necessary resources, including EC2 instances, load balancers, and databases, allowing you to focus on your application.

  4. Multi-container and Microservices Support: Elastic Beanstalk provides seamless support for multi-container Docker environments and microservices architecture. It allows you to deploy and manage multiple Docker containers as a single application, making it easy to scale and manage microservices-based applications. CodeDeploy, on the other hand, focuses on deploying applications to EC2 instances and does not have native support for multi-container or microservices architectures.

  5. Deployment Target: CodeDeploy is a more generic deployment service that can deploy applications to various target environments, including EC2 instances, on-premises instances, and even instances in other cloud providers. Elastic Beanstalk, on the other hand, is primarily designed for deploying applications on AWS infrastructure, such as EC2 instances, managed databases, and load balancers. It provides a higher level of abstraction and ease of use specifically for AWS deployments.

  6. Flexibility and Control: CodeDeploy provides a high level of flexibility and control over your deployment process. You can customize the deployment scripts, hooks, and configurations according to your specific requirements. Elastic Beanstalk, on the other hand, abstracts away many of the deployment details, providing a simpler and more automated experience. It is an ideal choice for developers who prefer a streamlined and managed deployment process.

In summary, AWS CodeDeploy provides more control and flexibility over the deployment process, supports various deployment targets, and allows fine-grained configuration. AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers a simplified and managed deployment experience, automates environment and infrastructure management, and provides seamless support for multi-container and microservices architectures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Beanstalk
Beanstalk
AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

Setup and manage repositories- Import or create Subversion and Git repositories that are instantly available to your team.;Invite team members, partners & clients- Restrict access to certain repos and provide read-only or full read/write permissions.;Browse files and changes- Every version of every file you’ve committed to Beanstalk is just a click away. See a timeline of who made changes and view the differences between revisions. Syntax highlighting for over 70 languages.;Preview, Compare & Share- Instantly preview HTML and image files in Beanstalk, compare versions side by side, and share them with your team, colleagues or clients, even if they don’t have a Beanstalk account.;Code Editing- Make and commit changes directly in the web interface of Beanstalk.;Blame Tool- View the line-by-line history of every file using Beanstalk's blame tool. Quickly see who was responsible for each line of code and which revision it belonged to.;Instantly deploy static assets from Beanstalk to your development, staging and production servers via Amazon S3, Rackspace Cloud Files, Heroku, DreamObjects;
AWS CodeDeploy fully automates your code deployments, allowing you to deploy reliably and rapidly;AWS CodeDeploy helps maximize your application availability by performing rolling updates across your Amazon EC2 instances and tracking application health according to configurable rules;AWS CodeDeploy allows you to easily launch and track the status of your deployments through the AWS Management Console or the AWS CLI;AWS CodeDeploy is platform and language agnostic and works with any application. You can easily reuse your existing setup code
Statistics
Stacks
85
Stacks
380
Followers
270
Followers
624
Votes
51
Votes
38
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Ftp deploy
  • 9
    Deployment
  • 8
    Easy to navigate
  • 4
    HipChat Integration
  • 4
    Code Editing
Pros
  • 17
    Automates code deployments
  • 9
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Adds autoscaling lifecycle hooks
  • 5
    Git integration
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Basecamp
Basecamp
Campfire
Campfire
FogBugz
FogBugz
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Harvest
Harvest
Zendesk
Zendesk
HipChat
HipChat
Bugify
Bugify
CircleCI
CircleCI
Codeship
Codeship
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
Solano CI
Solano CI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Ansible
Ansible
Chef
Chef
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs

What are some alternatives to Beanstalk, AWS CodeDeploy?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana