StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeCommit vs Travis CI

AWS CodeCommit vs Travis CI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Travis CI
Travis CI
Stacks28.0K
Followers6.7K
Votes1.7K
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Stacks324
Followers826
Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs Travis CI: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this comparison, we will discuss the key differences between AWS CodeCommit and Travis CI.

1. **Hosting Platform**: AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that hosts Git repositories, ensuring data encryption and scalability, while Travis CI is a cloud-based continuous integration platform that automates the testing and deployment processes.
2. **Pricing Model**: AWS CodeCommit follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, charging based on active users and storage consumption, whereas Travis CI offers a variety of pricing plans based on the number of concurrent builds and parallel jobs.
3. **Integration with AWS Services**: AWS CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), providing a coherent continuous integration and deployment environment within the AWS ecosystem, whereas Travis CI offers integrations with various third-party tools and services, expanding its compatibility beyond AWS.
4. **Scalability and Customization**: AWS CodeCommit provides highly scalable repositories with virtually unlimited storage capacity, allowing users to control access permissions and implement advanced security measures, whereas Travis CI offers a high degree of customization through configuration files, enabling users to define build matrix, stages, and workflows according to specific project requirements.
5. **Supported Languages and Environments**: AWS CodeCommit supports Git repositories for a wide range of programming languages, frameworks, and tools, allowing developers to work with their preferred environments, whereas Travis CI supports a diverse set of languages and environments for building and testing projects, ensuring compatibility across different development stacks.
6. **Community Support and Documentation**: Travis CI is well-known for its active community support and extensive documentation resources, helping users troubleshoot issues, optimize configurations, and share best practices collaboratively, while AWS CodeCommit benefits from AWS's comprehensive technical support and documentation for seamless integration with AWS services.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit is a secure and scalable source control service tightly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, while Travis CI is a versatile and customizable cloud-based continuous integration platform with broad language support and community engagement.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Travis CI, AWS CodeCommit

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Travis CI
Travis CI
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Easy Setup- Getting started with Travis CI is as easy as enabling a project, adding basic build instructions to your project and committing code.;Supports Your Platform- Lots of databases and services are pre-installed and can simply be enabled in your build configuration, we'll launch them for you automatically. MySQL, PostgreSQL, ElasticSearch, Redis, Riak, RabbitMQ, Memcached are available by default.;Deploy With Confidence- Deploying to production after a successful build is as easy as setting up a bit of configuration, and we'll deploy your code to Heroku, Engine Yard Cloud, Nodejitsu, cloudControl, OpenShift, and CloudFoundry.
Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks
28.0K
Stacks
324
Followers
6.7K
Followers
826
Votes
1.7K
Votes
193
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 506
    Github integration
  • 388
    Free for open source
  • 271
    Easy to get started
  • 191
    Nice interface
  • 162
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 8
    Can't be hosted insternally
  • 3
    Feature lacking
  • 3
    Unstable
  • 2
    Incomplete documentation for all platforms
Pros
  • 44
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 24
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 20
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 19
    Repo data encrypted at rest
Cons
  • 12
    UI sucks
  • 4
    SLOW
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 2
    Bad diffing/no blame
  • 2
    No fork
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Heroku
Heroku
AWS CodeDeploy
AWS CodeDeploy
MySQL
MySQL
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Nodejitsu
Nodejitsu
npm
npm
GitHub
GitHub
Engine Yard Cloud
Engine Yard Cloud
cloudControl
cloudControl
Git
Git
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Travis CI, AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana