AWS CodeBuild vs Yarn

Overview

Yarn

Stacks28.2K

Followers13.5K

Votes151

GitHub Stars41.5K

Forks2.7K

AWS CodeBuild

Stacks443

Followers485

Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this section, we will analyze and compare the key differences between AWS CodeBuild and Yarn.

Scalability and Flexibility: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Yarn is a package manager for the JavaScript programming language. AWS CodeBuild offers scalable and flexible build environments, which can be easily customized to meet specific requirements. On the other hand, Yarn focuses on package management and dependency resolution, offering a consistent and reliable environment for building projects.
Integration with Other AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CloudFormation. This allows for seamless development and deployment workflows within the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Yarn is not specifically designed to integrate with AWS services, although it can be used in conjunction with them.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild pricing is based on the number of build minutes consumed, with different pricing tiers available. This allows users to pay only for the resources they actually use. On the other hand, Yarn is an open-source tool and does not have any direct cost associated with its usage.
Built-in Security and Compliance: AWS CodeBuild provides built-in security and compliance features, including the ability to run builds in isolated environments and integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM). This ensures that builds are performed securely and in accordance with organizational policies. Yarn, being a package manager, does not offer the same level of security features.
Language and Platform Support: AWS CodeBuild supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, including popular ones like Java, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. It also has pre-configured build environments for popular frameworks and tools. Yarn, on the other hand, is specific to JavaScript and is primarily used for managing JavaScript packages.
Maintenance and Support: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service, which means that AWS takes care of maintaining and scaling the infrastructure. It also offers technical support and documentation for users. Yarn, being an open-source tool, relies on the community for maintenance and support.

In summary, AWS CodeBuild provides a scalable and flexible build service with deep integration with other AWS services, while Yarn is a package manager focused on JavaScript package management. AWS CodeBuild offers built-in security and compliance features with a pay-as-you-go pricing model, while Yarn is an open-source tool specific to JavaScript.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Yarn, AWS CodeBuild

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

zen-li

Apr 24, 2019

Reviewon

Yarn

p.s.

I am not sure about the performance of the latest version of npm, whether it is different from my understanding of it below. Because I use npm very rarely when I had the following knowledge.

------⏬

I use Yarn because, first, yarn is the first tool to lock the version. Second, although npm also supports the lock version, when you use npm to lock the version, and then use package-lock.json on other systems, package-lock.json Will be modified. You understand what I mean, when you deploy projects based on Git...

250k views250k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Yarn	AWS CodeBuild
Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.	AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.
-	Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
GitHub Stars 41.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 28.2K	Stacks 443
Followers 13.5K	Followers 485
Votes 151	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 85 Incredibly fast 22 Easy to use 13 Open Source 11 Can install any npm package 8 Works where npm fails Cons 16 Facebook 7 Sends data to facebook 4 Should be installed separately 3 Cannot publish to registry other than npm	Pros 7 Pay per minute 5 Parameter Store integration for passing secrets 4 Integrated with AWS 3 Bit bucket integration 3 Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch Cons 2 Poor branch support
Integrations
JavaScript npm	AWS Elastic Beanstalk AWS CodeCommit Amazon S3 GitHub Bitbucket AWS CloudFormation Jenkins GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to Yarn, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeBuild vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this section, we will analyze and compare the key differences between AWS CodeBuild and Yarn.

Scalability and Flexibility: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Yarn is a package manager for the JavaScript programming language. AWS CodeBuild offers scalable and flexible build environments, which can be easily customized to meet specific requirements. On the other hand, Yarn focuses on package management and dependency resolution, offering a consistent and reliable environment for building projects.
Integration with Other AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodePipeline, and AWS CloudFormation. This allows for seamless development and deployment workflows within the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Yarn is not specifically designed to integrate with AWS services, although it can be used in conjunction with them.
Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild pricing is based on the number of build minutes consumed, with different pricing tiers available. This allows users to pay only for the resources they actually use. On the other hand, Yarn is an open-source tool and does not have any direct cost associated with its usage.
Built-in Security and Compliance: AWS CodeBuild provides built-in security and compliance features, including the ability to run builds in isolated environments and integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM). This ensures that builds are performed securely and in accordance with organizational policies. Yarn, being a package manager, does not offer the same level of security features.
Language and Platform Support: AWS CodeBuild supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, including popular ones like Java, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. It also has pre-configured build environments for popular frameworks and tools. Yarn, on the other hand, is specific to JavaScript and is primarily used for managing JavaScript packages.
Maintenance and Support: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service, which means that AWS takes care of maintaining and scaling the infrastructure. It also offers technical support and documentation for users. Yarn, being an open-source tool, relies on the community for maintenance and support.

AWS CodeBuild vs Yarn

Overview

AWS CodeBuild vs Yarn: What are the differences?