AWS CodeBuild vs gulp

Overview

gulp

Stacks15.3K

Followers9.1K

Votes1.7K

GitHub Stars33.0K

Forks4.2K

AWS CodeBuild

Stacks443

Followers485

Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs gulp: What are the differences?

Introduction: AWS CodeBuild and Gulp are two popular tools used in web development for building and automating tasks. Both serve different purposes and have their own unique features that cater to various development needs.

Execution Environment: AWS CodeBuild runs builds on managed environments in the AWS Cloud, providing scalability and flexibility, while Gulp runs on developer's local machine or server, offering more control over the environment settings and configurations.
Managed Service vs. Task Runner: AWS CodeBuild is a managed service that handles the entire build process, including provisioning resources and executing the build, whereas Gulp is a task runner that requires developers to define tasks in a configuration file to automate repetitive tasks.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, allowing developers to easily incorporate functionalities like deployment to AWS CodeDeploy, whereas Gulp is more standalone and requires additional plugins or configurations for integration with external services.
Scalability: AWS CodeBuild offers scalable build infrastructure based on project requirements, automatically handling the scaling of resources, while Gulp's scalability is limited to the capacity of the machine it is running on, making it more suitable for smaller projects.
Pricing: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on build minutes and resources used, which can be cost-effective for large-scale projects, whereas Gulp is open-source and free to use, making it a more budget-friendly option for small to medium-sized projects.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and Gulp differ in their execution environment, being a managed service vs. task runner, integration with AWS services, scalability, and pricing, catering to different development needs and project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

gulp	AWS CodeBuild
Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.	AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.
By preferring code over configuration, gulp keeps simple things simple and makes complex tasks manageable.;By harnessing the power of node's streams you get fast builds that don't write intermediary files to disk.;gulp's strict plugin guidelines assure plugins stay simple and work the way you expect.;With a minimal API surface, you can pick up gulp in no time. Your build works just like you envision it: a series of streaming pipes.	Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 15.3K	Stacks 443
Followers 9.1K	Followers 485
Votes 1.7K	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 451 Build speed 277 Readable 244 Code-over-configuration 210 Open source 175 Node streams	Pros 7 Pay per minute 5 Parameter Store integration for passing secrets 4 Integrated with AWS 3 Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch 3 Bit bucket integration Cons 2 Poor branch support
Integrations
No integrations available	AWS Elastic Beanstalk AWS CodeCommit Amazon S3 GitHub Bitbucket AWS CloudFormation Jenkins GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to gulp, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeBuild vs gulp: What are the differences?

Execution Environment: AWS CodeBuild runs builds on managed environments in the AWS Cloud, providing scalability and flexibility, while Gulp runs on developer's local machine or server, offering more control over the environment settings and configurations.
Managed Service vs. Task Runner: AWS CodeBuild is a managed service that handles the entire build process, including provisioning resources and executing the build, whereas Gulp is a task runner that requires developers to define tasks in a configuration file to automate repetitive tasks.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, allowing developers to easily incorporate functionalities like deployment to AWS CodeDeploy, whereas Gulp is more standalone and requires additional plugins or configurations for integration with external services.
Scalability: AWS CodeBuild offers scalable build infrastructure based on project requirements, automatically handling the scaling of resources, while Gulp's scalability is limited to the capacity of the machine it is running on, making it more suitable for smaller projects.
Pricing: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on build minutes and resources used, which can be cost-effective for large-scale projects, whereas Gulp is open-source and free to use, making it a more budget-friendly option for small to medium-sized projects.

AWS CodeBuild vs gulp

Overview