Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodeBuild vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between AWS CodeBuild and Docker Compose, two technologies commonly used in the development and deployment of applications.
Scalability: One key difference between AWS CodeBuild and Docker Compose is the scalability aspect. AWS CodeBuild offers built-in scalability, allowing you to easily scale your build environment based on the workload. On the other hand, Docker Compose does not have built-in scalability mechanisms and requires manual setup and management for scaling.
Managed Service vs Self-Managed: Another important difference is that AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service provided by AWS, while Docker Compose is a self-managed tool. With AWS CodeBuild, AWS takes care of the underlying infrastructure, maintenance, and updates, relieving the user from the operational overhead. In contrast, Docker Compose requires the user to set up and manage the infrastructure where the Docker containers will run.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild is tightly integrated with other AWS services, such as CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and CloudWatch. This tight integration allows for seamless integration in the AWS ecosystem, simplifying the development workflow. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is a more generic tool that can be used with any infrastructure provider, not limited to AWS.
Portability: Docker Compose offers high portability as it allows you to define the application's infrastructure and dependencies in a single declarative file (usually a YAML file). This file can be shared across different environments, making it easy to replicate and deploy the application on different platforms. AWS CodeBuild, although it provides some level of configurability, is tightly integrated with the AWS ecosystem, which may limit its portability to other cloud providers or on-premises environments.
Costs: AWS CodeBuild pricing is typically based on the amount of build time consumed and the compute resources utilized, providing a pay-as-you-go model. Docker Compose, being a self-managed tool, does not have direct costs associated with it. However, the user needs to consider the costs of the underlying infrastructure where the Docker containers will be running.
Deployment Management: AWS CodeBuild focuses on building the application artifacts and does not provide built-in deployment management capabilities. On the other hand, Docker Compose allows you to define the deployment configuration in the same declarative file, allowing for easier management of the deployment process.
In Summary, AWS CodeBuild offers built-in scalability, is a fully managed service provided by AWS, tightly integrates with AWS services, and has a more limited portability compared to Docker Compose. Docker Compose, on the other hand, requires manual management of scalability, is a self-managed tool, provides more portability options, and allows for easier deployment management.
Pros of AWS CodeBuild
- Pay per minute7
- Parameter Store integration for passing secrets5
- Integrated with AWS4
- Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch3
- Bit bucket integration3
- GitHub Webhooks support2
- AWS Config and Config rule integration for compliance2
- VPC PrivateLinks to invoke service without internet2
- Windows/.NET support1
- Jenkins plugin integration1
- Ondemand scaling of build jobs1
- Scheduled builds with CloudWatch Events integration1
- Local build debug support1
- Native support for accessing Amazon VPC resources1
- Docker based build environment1
- Support for bringing custom Docker images1
- Fully managed (no installation/updates, servers to mai1
- PCI, SOC, ISO, HIPAA compliant1
- Full API/SDKs/CLI support1
- YAML based configuration1
- Great support (forums, premium support, SO, GitHub)1
- Perpetual free tier option (100 mins/month)1
- GitHub Enterprise support1
Pros of Docker Compose
- Multi-container descriptor123
- Fast development environment setup110
- Easy linking of containers79
- Simple yaml configuration68
- Easy setup60
- Yml or yaml format16
- Use Standard Docker API12
- Open source8
- Go from template to application in minutes5
- Can choose Discovery Backend5
- Scalable4
- Easy configuration4
- Kubernetes integration4
- Quick and easy3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS CodeBuild
- Poor branch support2
Cons of Docker Compose
- Tied to single machine9
- Still very volatile, changing syntax often5