StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Coverage
  4. Code Coverage
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs Codecov

AWS CodeBuild vs Codecov

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codecov
Codecov
Stacks2.8K
Followers325
Votes102
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs Codecov: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and Codecov outlining their key differences.

1. **Integration with AWS Services**: AWS CodeBuild is deeply integrated with various AWS services such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodePipeline, and Amazon S3, providing a seamless development and deployment experience within the AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, Codecov is a third-party tool that can be used with any CI/CD platform, not limited to AWS services, making it more versatile for different development environments.
   
2. **Build Environment Management**: AWS CodeBuild manages the build environment, allowing developers to specify custom environments through Docker containers or use pre-configured environments provided by AWS. Codecov, on the other hand, focuses on code coverage reports and does not handle the build environment management, which is a task typically carried out by the CI/CD tool in use.

3. **Code Coverage Analysis**: A significant difference between AWS CodeBuild and Codecov is their primary focus. CodeBuild is mainly focused on building and testing applications while providing limited code coverage analysis capabilities. In contrast, Codecov specializes in producing detailed code coverage reports for tracking the effectiveness of the tests.

4. **Pricing Structure**: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the number of minutes your build runs and the compute resources required. Codecov, on the other hand, offers tiered pricing based on the number of repositories and users, which may be more beneficial for organizations with specific budget requirements.

5. **Collaboration and Notification Features**: Codecov comes with collaboration and notification features that allow team members to work together on improving code coverage, reviewing pull requests, and setting up alerts for code changes. AWS CodeBuild, being more focused on build automation, does not offer such extensive collaboration features out of the box.

6. **Community Support and Documentation**: Codecov has a strong community presence with active forums, detailed documentation, and continuous updates, making it easier for users to troubleshoot issues and find support. While AWS CodeBuild benefits from AWS's comprehensive support and documentation, the community aspect may not be as prominent for CodeBuild users.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and Codecov differ in their integration with AWS services, build environment management, focus on code coverage analysis, pricing structure, collaboration, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Codecov, AWS CodeBuild

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codecov
Codecov
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

Beautiful Reports;Pull Request Comments;Interactive Commit Graphs;Chrome Extension;Github Commit Status;Easy to Integrate;Hipchat Integration
Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
Stacks
2.8K
Stacks
443
Followers
325
Followers
485
Votes
102
Votes
43
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Easy setup
  • 17
    More stable than coveralls
  • 14
    GitHub integration
  • 11
    They reply their users
  • 10
    Easy setup,great ui
Cons
  • 1
    GitHub org / team integration is a little too tight
  • 0
    Support does not respond to email
  • 0
    Delayed results by hours since recent outage
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Integrations
HipChat
HipChat
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Heroku
Heroku
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to Codecov, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana