Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Auth0 vs Django REST framework JWT: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will explore the key differences between Auth0 and Django REST framework JWT. Both Auth0 and Django REST framework JWT are popular tools for implementing authentication and authorization in web applications. However, there are several differences between these two solutions that developers should consider when choosing between them.
Integration and Setup: Auth0 is a cloud-based authentication and authorization platform that provides a wide range of features and integrations out of the box. It requires developers to create an account, set up an application, and configure the necessary settings. On the other hand, Django REST framework JWT is a library that can be easily integrated into Django-based applications. Developers need to install the library, configure the settings in the Django project, and handle the authentication and authorization logic themselves.
Flexibility and Customization: Auth0 offers a high level of flexibility and customization options. It allows developers to implement various authentication methods (e.g., username/password, social logins, multi-factor authentication) and customize the login experience with branding and UI customization. Django REST framework JWT, on the other hand, focuses on JSON Web Tokens (JWT) as the authentication mechanism and provides a standard set of features. While it offers some customization options, the level of flexibility is not as extensive as Auth0.
Security and Scalability: Auth0 is designed to handle authentication and authorization at scale. It provides robust security features such as automatic token expiration, token revocation, and JWT signature verification. It also supports features like single sign-on (SSO) and multi-tenancy. Django REST framework JWT, while secure, does not offer the same level of built-in security features as Auth0. Developers need to implement additional security measures, such as token expiration and revocation, manually.
Community and Support: Auth0 has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. It also provides official SDKs for various programming languages and frameworks. Django REST framework JWT also has a supportive community, but its community size and resources might be relatively smaller compared to Auth0. Developers might need to rely more on the Django community for support and documentation.
Pricing and Cost: Auth0 offers both free and paid plans, with different pricing tiers based on the number of active users and additional features. The pricing model is based on the number of monthly active users (MAUs). Django REST framework JWT, being an open-source library, is free to use and does not have any direct costs. However, developers need to consider the infrastructure costs and development efforts required to implement and maintain the authentication and authorization logic.
In Summary, Auth0 is a cloud-based platform with extensive authentication and authorization features, providing flexibility and scalability at the expense of higher complexity and potential costs. Django REST framework JWT is a library that focuses on JWT-based authentication, offering simplicity and cost-effectiveness but with less extensive built-in features. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and trade-offs of the application being developed.
Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?
As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?
I would recommend Auth0 only if you are willing to shell out money. You can keep up with their free version only for a very limited time and as per our experience as a growing startup where budget is an issue, their support was not very helpful as they first asked us to sign a commercial agreement even before helping us t o find out whether Auth0 fits our use case or not! But otherwise Auth0 is a great platform to speed up authentication. In our case we had to move to alternatives like Casbin for multi-tenant authorization!
I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.
When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.
The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.
Pros of Auth0
- JSON web token69
- Integration with 20+ Social Providers31
- It's a universal solution20
- SDKs20
- Amazing Documentation15
- Heroku Add-on11
- Enterprise support8
- Great Sample Repos7
- Extend platform with "rules"7
- Azure Add-on4
- Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider3
- Passwordless3
- It can integrate seamlessly with firebase2
- Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support2
- Polished2
- On-premise deployment2
- Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance1
- MFA1
- Active Directory support1
- Springboot1
- SOC21
- SAML Support1
- Great support1
- OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support1
Pros of Django REST framework JWT
- Stateless2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Auth0
- Pricing too high (Developer Pro)15
- Poor support7
- Rapidly changing API4
- Status page not reflect actual status4