Aurelia vs Ember.js vs Marionette

Overview

Ember.js

Stacks1.6K

Followers865

Votes775

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks4.2K

Marionette

Stacks169

Followers128

Votes80

GitHub Stars7.1K

Forks1.2K

Aurelia

Stacks276

Followers294

Votes374

GitHub Stars11.7K

Forks613

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ember.js, Marionette, Aurelia

neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ember.js	Marionette	Aurelia
A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.	It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.	Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.
Creating web apps;Building UI	Layouts; Utilities; Behaviors; Radio; Objects	Two-Way Databinding;Routing & UI Composition;Extensible HTML;MV* with Conventions;Broad Language Support;Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.6K	GitHub Stars 7.1K	GitHub Stars 11.7K
GitHub Forks 4.2K	GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 613
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 169	Stacks 276
Followers 865	Followers 128	Followers 294
Votes 775	Votes 80	Votes 374
Pros & Cons
Pros 126 Elegant 97 Quick to develop 83 Great mvc 82 Great community 73 Great router Cons 2 Very little flexibility 2 Too much convention, too little configuration 1 Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful 1 Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps	Pros 20 MVC compliant 20 Uses Backbone 13 Views management 9 View management 7 JavaScript	Pros 47 Simple with conventions 42 Modern architecture 39 Makes sense and is mostly javascript not framework 31 Extensible 28 Integrates well with other components
Integrations
Node.js AngularJS Bootstrap	Meteor JavaScript Algolia Backbone.js	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Ember.js, Marionette, Aurelia?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Durandal

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.

Chaplin

Chaplin addresses Backbone’s limitations by providing a lightweight and flexible structure that features well-proven design patterns and best practices. Chaplin empowers you to quickly develop scalable single-page web applications; allowing you to focus on designing and developing the underlying functionality in your web application.

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

GWT

It is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Aurelia vs Ember.js vs Marionette