StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Celery vs asyncio

Celery vs asyncio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Celery
Celery
Stacks1.7K
Followers1.6K
Votes280
GitHub Stars27.5K
Forks4.9K
asyncio
asyncio
Stacks126
Followers158
Votes13

Celery vs asyncio: What are the differences?

Celery and asyncio are both popular frameworks used for asynchronous task execution in Python. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Concurrency Model: Celery uses a traditional multi-process approach for concurrency, where tasks are executed by multiple worker processes. On the other hand, asyncio is based on the concept of coroutines and uses a single-threaded event loop to achieve asynchronous concurrency.

  2. Dependencies: Celery relies on separate message brokers like RabbitMQ or Redis for task message passing, whereas asyncio does not require any external dependencies for message passing as it leverages the inbuilt event loop.

  3. Complexity: Celery provides a more feature-rich and complex framework with a higher learning curve. It offers various advanced features such as task result tracking, task retries, and scheduling. On the contrary, asyncio is lightweight and simpler, focusing primarily on providing a foundation for building asynchronous applications.

  4. Compatibility: Celery supports different message queuing systems and can be easily integrated with various web frameworks and databases. It offers a wider range of compatibility options. In contrast, asyncio is a built-in library introduced in Python 3.4 and is limited to the Python ecosystem.

  5. Integration with Synchronous Code: Celery easily integrates with synchronous codebases, allowing the coexistence of both synchronous and asynchronous code. On the other hand, mixing asyncio with synchronous code can be more challenging due to the differences in execution models.

  6. Maturity and Community: Celery has been around for a longer time and has a mature and active community supporting it. It has a rich ecosystem with various plugins and extensions. asyncio, although it has gained popularity rapidly, is relatively newer and has a smaller community and a more limited set of available libraries and tools.

In summary, Celery is a distributed task queue in Python that allows for asynchronous task execution, supporting various backends like Redis or RabbitMQ. asyncio is a built-in Python library for writing single-threaded concurrent code using asynchronous programming, enabling non-blocking I/O operations within a single thread.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Celery
Celery
asyncio
asyncio

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

This module provides infrastructure for writing single-threaded concurrent code using coroutines, multiplexing I/O access over sockets and other resources, running network clients and servers, and other related primitives.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
126
Followers
1.6K
Followers
158
Votes
280
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Task queue
  • 63
    Python integration
  • 40
    Django integration
  • 30
    Scheduled Task
  • 19
    Publish/subsribe
Cons
  • 4
    Sometimes loses tasks
  • 1
    Depends on broker
Pros
  • 4
    Cooperative Multitasking
  • 4
    I/O Wait
  • 3
    Network Call
  • 2
    I/O bound computation

What are some alternatives to Celery, asyncio?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase