StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Compliance
  5. Aptible vs CFEngine

Aptible vs CFEngine

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Aptible
Aptible
Stacks33
Followers20
Votes0
CFEngine
CFEngine
Stacks7
Followers28
Votes0

Aptible vs CFEngine: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of DevOps tools, Aptible and CFEngine are both popular choices for managing and automating infrastructure. While both tools aim to streamline operations, they have key differences that distinguish them from each other.

1. Scalability: Aptible focuses on providing a scalable platform for deploying and managing applications, making it ideal for growing businesses with dynamic infrastructure needs. On the other hand, CFEngine is more oriented towards configuration management, offering robust automation capabilities for maintaining system configurations across multiple devices.

2. Language Support: Aptible primarily supports Docker containers, enabling developers to build and deploy applications using containerization technology. CFEngine, on the other hand, relies on a domain-specific language (DSL) called CFEngine Policy Language (CPL) for defining configuration policies and automation tasks.

3. Community Support: While Aptible offers extensive documentation and support resources for its users, CFEngine has a well-established community of users and contributors who actively participate in forums, mailing lists, and events. This community-driven approach allows CFEngine users to access a wealth of knowledge and expertise.

4. Pricing Model: Aptible operates on a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay based on the resources and features they require. In contrast, CFEngine follows an open-source model, offering its core software for free and charging for additional enterprise features and support services.

5. Target Audience: Aptible is tailored towards development teams looking to easily deploy and monitor applications in a secure environment, making it a popular choice for startups and small to medium-sized businesses. CFEngine, on the other hand, caters to system administrators and IT operations teams seeking robust automation and configuration management solutions for complex infrastructures.

6. Vendor Lock-in: Aptible's platform-as-a-service (PaaS) offering may lead to potential vendor lock-in if users heavily rely on its proprietary infrastructure and services. In contrast, CFEngine's open-source nature provides users with more flexibility and control over their automation workflows and configurations.

In Summary, Aptible and CFEngine cater to different needs within the realm of DevOps tooling, with Aptible focusing on scalable application deployment and management, while CFEngine specializes in configuration management and automation for diverse infrastructures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Aptible
Aptible
CFEngine
CFEngine

Aptible is the world’s first application deployment platform built to automate HIPAA compliance for web and mobile technology. Run the applications and databases of your choice. Seamlessly integrate advanced compliance tools with the platform to generate all of the documentation, audit logs, and explanatory materials you need to demonstrate compliance with every aspect of HIPAA.

It is an IT infrastructure automation and Continuous Operations framework that helps engineers, system administrators and other stakeholders in an IT organization manage IT infrastructure while ensuring service levels and compliance

No lock-in - Integration is as simple as adding a single file to your codebase. No proprietary APIs, no migration fees, and no dev/prod disparity.;Built for your workflow - If you're familiar with Heroku, you already know how to use Aptible: Push code to a Git remote, then configure and manage resources from the command line or through our web dashboard.;One-stop HIPAA compliance - Running your apps and databases gives our compliance tools deep hooks into your ops, saving you time and money on every aspect of HIPAA.
Configuration management; Process management.
Statistics
Stacks
33
Stacks
7
Followers
20
Followers
28
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Server Density
Server Density
Airbrake
Airbrake
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Datadog
Datadog
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute

What are some alternatives to Aptible, CFEngine?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana