StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Apache Thrift vs Kafka

Apache Thrift vs Kafka

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Stacks193
Followers245
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.8K
Forks4.1K

Apache Thrift vs Kafka: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Thrift and Kafka are two widely used technologies in the field of distributed systems and data processing. While both serve different purposes, there are key differences between them. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Communication Protocol vs. Stream Processing: Apache Thrift is a communication protocol and framework that allows various services to communicate with each other efficiently. It provides a way to define the data types and services using an interface definition language (IDL) and generates the code needed for communication in multiple languages. On the other hand, Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that allows you to publish and subscribe to streams of records, store them reliably, and process them in real-time.

  2. Message Size vs. Pub-Sub: Thrift primarily focuses on efficient communication and allows you to specify the structure of the data you want to transmit. It optimizes the message size by serializing the data into a compact binary format. On the contrary, Kafka is designed as a distributed pub-sub system. It allows you to publish messages (called records) to specific topics, and multiple consumers can subscribe to those topics and consume the records in parallel.

  3. Data Types vs. Data Streams: Thrift provides a wider range of data types compared to Kafka. With Thrift, you can define complex data structures including nested structures, enums, and collections. It allows you to define how the data should be serialized and deserialized, ensuring compatibility between different services. Kafka, on the other hand, focuses on data streams. It deals with records which are key-value pairs, and you have control over how the data is serialized and deserialized.

  4. Service-Oriented Architecture vs. Event-Driven Architecture: Thrift enables service-oriented architecture where different services interact with each other through defined interfaces. It allows remote procedure calls (RPC) between services, making it suitable for building microservices-based systems. In contrast, Kafka follows an event-driven architecture. It treats events as first-class citizens and allows multiple services to react to those events in real-time.

  5. In-Memory Data Transfer vs. Disk-Based Persistence: Thrift primarily focuses on in-memory data transfer for efficient communication. It optimizes serialization and deserialization to reduce the overhead of data transfer. It doesn't provide built-in persistence for data storage. On the other hand, Kafka is designed to persist the streams of data on disk. It provides fault-tolerant and durable storage even in case of failures, making it suitable for scenarios where data durability is critical.

  6. Error Handling vs. Scalability: Apache Thrift allows you to define exceptions as part of your service definitions. It provides a way to handle errors during the communication process. It focuses on the efficient utilization of system resources and is highly scalable due to its modular architecture. Kafka, on the other hand, handles errors in a different way. It provides built-in fault tolerance and replication mechanisms to ensure data integrity and scalability.

In Summary, Apache Thrift is a communication protocol framework that focuses on efficient communication and supports service-oriented architecture, while Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that focuses on data streams, event-driven architecture, and fault-tolerant, scalable data processing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kafka, Apache Thrift

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.9k views10.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kafka
Kafka
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

The Apache Thrift software framework, for scalable cross-language services development, combines a software stack with a code generation engine to build services that work efficiently and seamlessly between C++, Java, Python, PHP, Ruby, Erlang, Perl, Haskell, C#, Cocoa, JavaScript, Node.js, Smalltalk, OCaml and Delphi and other languages.

Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Stars
10.8K
GitHub Forks
14.8K
GitHub Forks
4.1K
Stacks
24.2K
Stacks
193
Followers
22.3K
Followers
245
Votes
607
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Kafka, Apache Thrift?

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

IronMQ

IronMQ

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase