Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ansible

18.9K
15.3K
+ 1
1.3K
Rundeck

201
340
+ 1
7
Add tool

Ansible vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

Ansible and Rundeck are both popular IT automation tools that help to streamline and simplify various operational tasks. Below are the key differences between them:

  1. Architecture: Ansible is a configuration management tool that follows a push-based model. It uses SSH and runs tasks on target hosts directly. On the other hand, Rundeck is a job scheduling tool that adopts a more robust client-server architecture. It leverages the Rundeck server to execute jobs on remote nodes via various plugins or protocols. This fundamental difference in architecture has implications on the scale and complexity of the automation tasks each tool can handle.

  2. Flexibility and Extensibility: Ansible offers a rich set of modules and plugins that allow users to automate a wide range of tasks. It supports a large number of platforms and can be easily extended with custom modules. In contrast, Rundeck is primarily focused on job scheduling and orchestration. While Rundeck provides various plugins to integrate with other tools, it may not have the same level of flexibility and extensibility as Ansible for complex automation scenarios.

  3. Workflow and Orchestration: Ansible provides a powerful and flexible workflow engine that allows users to define complex automation workflows using YAML. It enables tasks to be executed in a specific sequence, with conditions, loops, and error handling. On the other hand, Rundeck offers advanced job scheduling and orchestration capabilities. It allows users to create workflows by defining dependencies between jobs, parallel execution, and controlling the flow of execution based on various conditions.

  4. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Ansible follows a simple and easy-to-understand YAML-based syntax for creating playbooks and tasks. This makes it relatively easy for beginners to get started with Ansible. Rundeck, on the other hand, has a more complex and feature-rich user interface that may require some learning curve for new users.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Ansible has a large and thriving community with active contributors and a vast ecosystem of pre-built playbooks, modules, and roles. This makes it easier for users to find solutions, share knowledge, and contribute to the community. Rundeck also has an active community, but it may not have the same level of community support and ecosystem as Ansible.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Ansible is designed to handle large-scale automation tasks efficiently. It supports parallel execution and can manage a large number of nodes simultaneously. Rundeck, being primarily a job scheduler, may have limitations in terms of scalability and performance when it comes to handling a large number of targets or complex workflows.

In summary, Ansible is a versatile open-source automation tool for configuration management and application deployment, emphasizing simplicity and ease of use. Rundeck, on the other hand, is a job scheduling and runbook automation platform designed for managing and orchestrating complex workflows, providing a centralized control point for operations tasks.

Advice on Ansible and Rundeck
Needs advice
on
AnsibleAnsibleChefChef
and
Puppet LabsPuppet Labs

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends
on
AnsibleAnsible

I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.

The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.

See more
Gabriel Pa
Recommends
on
KubernetesKubernetes
at

If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Ansible
Pros of Rundeck
  • 284
    Agentless
  • 210
    Great configuration
  • 199
    Simple
  • 176
    Powerful
  • 155
    Easy to learn
  • 69
    Flexible
  • 55
    Doesn't get in the way of getting s--- done
  • 35
    Makes sense
  • 30
    Super efficient and flexible
  • 27
    Powerful
  • 11
    Dynamic Inventory
  • 9
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 7
    Works with AWS
  • 6
    Cloud Oriented
  • 6
    Easy to maintain
  • 4
    Vagrant provisioner
  • 4
    Simple and powerful
  • 4
    Multi language
  • 4
    Simple
  • 4
    Because SSH
  • 4
    Procedural or declarative, or both
  • 4
    Easy
  • 3
    Consistency
  • 2
    Well-documented
  • 2
    Masterless
  • 2
    Debugging is simple
  • 2
    Merge hash to get final configuration similar to hiera
  • 2
    Fast as hell
  • 1
    Manage any OS
  • 1
    Work on windows, but difficult to manage
  • 1
    Certified Content
  • 3
    Role based access control
  • 3
    Easy to understand
  • 1
    Doesn't need containers

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Ansible
Cons of Rundeck
  • 8
    Dangerous
  • 5
    Hard to install
  • 3
    Doesn't Run on Windows
  • 3
    Bloated
  • 3
    Backward compatibility
  • 2
    No immutable infrastructure
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Ansible?

    Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

    What is Rundeck?

    A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Ansible?
    What companies use Rundeck?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Ansible or Rundeck.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Ansible?
    What tools integrate with Rundeck?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+14
    12
    2615
    GitGitHubSlack+30
    27
    18412
    JavaScriptGitGitHub+33
    20
    2092
    GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
    12
    6579
    JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
    53
    21948
    What are some alternatives to Ansible and Rundeck?
    Puppet Labs
    Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.
    Chef
    Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.
    Salt
    Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.
    Terraform
    With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    See all alternatives