Ansible vs Puppet Labs

Overview

Puppet Labs

Stacks1.3K

Followers793

Votes227

GitHub Stars7.7K

Forks2.2K

Ansible

Stacks19.5K

Followers15.6K

Votes1.3K

GitHub Stars66.9K

Forks24.1K

Ansible vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?

Configuration Language: Ansible uses YAML for configuration management, providing a simple and human-readable syntax, while Puppet Labs uses its own domain-specific language that can have a steeper learning curve.
Agentless vs. Agent-based: Ansible operates in an agentless mode, connecting to remote systems via SSH, which simplifies deployment and management. On the other hand, Puppet Labs requires an agent to be installed on each managed node, adding complexity to the infrastructure.
Workflow Automation: Ansible is more focused on task execution and orchestration, allowing for simpler automation of workflows. In contrast, Puppet Labs emphasizes the desired state configuration management approach, ensuring that the system remains in a defined state over time.
Community Support: Ansible has a large and active community that contributes to its vast collection of roles and modules. Puppet Labs, while also having a strong community, may not have as extensive a library of pre-built modules as Ansible.
Ease of Use: Ansible is known for its ease of use and quick setup, making it a popular choice for rapid deployment and configuration tasks. Puppet Labs, with its more complex agent-based architecture, may require more time and effort to set up and maintain.
Scalability: Ansible is well-suited for small to medium-sized infrastructures due to its agentless design and lightweight nature. In comparison, Puppet Labs may be better suited for larger, more complex environments that require strict control over system configurations.

In Summary, Ansible and Puppet Labs differ in configuration language, agent architecture, workflow automation, community support, ease of use, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Puppet Labs, Ansible

Rogério

Software Developer

Aug 10, 2021

Needs adviceon

Docker

Git

Linux

Personal Dotfiles management

Given that they are all “configuration management” tools - meaning they are designed to deploy, configure and manage servers - what would be the simplest - and yet robust - solution to manage personal dotfiles - for n00bs.

Ideally, I reckon, it should:

be containerized (@{Docker}|tool:586|?)
be versionable (@{Git}|tool:1046|)
ensure idempotency
allow full automation (tests, CI/CD, etc.)
be fully recoverable (@{Linux}|tool:10483|/ @{macOS}|tool:5560|)
be easier to setup/manage (as much as possible)

Does it make sense?

282k views282k

Comments

Hendrik

CEO at Forward H

Dec 13, 2021

Decided

Terraform provides a cloud-provider agnostic way of provisioning cloud infrastructure while AWS CloudFormation is limited to AWS.

Pulumi is a great tool that provides similar features as Terraform, including advanced features like policy and cost management.

We see that Terraform has great support in the cloud community. For most cloud services we use, there is an official Terraform provider. We also believe in the declarative model of HCL, which is why we chose Terraform over Pulumi. However, we still keep an eye on Pulumi's progress.

Ansible is great for provisioning software and configuration within virtual machines, but we don't think that Ansible is the right tool for provisioning cloud infrastructure since it's built around the assumption that there is an inventory of remote machines. Terraform also supports more services that we use than Ansible.

22.2k views22.2k

Comments

ajit

Jan 12, 2022

Needs adviceon

Rundeck

Ansible

Jenkins

We have a lot of operations running using Rundeck (including deployments) and we also have various roles created in Ansible for infrastructure creation, which we execute using Rundeck. Rundeck we are using a community edition. Since we are already using Rundeck for executing the Ansible role, need an advice. What difference will it make if we replace Rundeck with Ansible Tower? Advantages and Disadvantages? We are using Jenkins to call Rundeck Job, same will be used for Ansible Tower if we replace Rundeck.

110k views110k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Puppet Labs	Ansible
Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.	Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
Insight- Puppet Enterprise's event inspector gives immediate and actionable insight into your environment, showing you what changed, where and how by classes, nodes and resources.;Discovery- Puppet Enterprise delivers a dynamic and fully-pluggable discovery service that allows you to take advantage of any data source or real-time query results to quickly locate, identify and group cloud nodes.;Provisioning- Automatically provision and configure bare metal, virtual, and private or public cloud capacity, all from a single pane. Save time getting your cloud projects off the ground by reusing the same configuration modules you set up for your physical deployments.;Configuration Management- Puppet Enterprise's declarative, model-based approach automates repetitive tasks and eliminates configuration drift. You define the desired state of your infrastructure, and Puppet Enterprise enforces this state, freeing you to work on tougher projects.;Orchestration- Quickly deploy critical updates, like security patches, across hundreds of servers in seconds, or proactively initiate Puppet runs to update configurations and report changes. Puppet Enterprise allows you to orchestrate controlled, multi-step operations to targeted collections of nodes, giving you complete control over infrastructure changes.;Reporting- Get visibility into your infrastructure, browse resources, and view reports that help you manage your configuration. Puppet Enterprise provides node hardware and software inventory, Puppet run change reports, and node configuration graphs via the product's console or 3rd party APIs.	Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.;Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.;Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.7K	GitHub Stars 66.9K
GitHub Forks 2.2K	GitHub Forks 24.1K
Stacks 1.3K	Stacks 19.5K
Followers 793	Followers 15.6K
Votes 227	Votes 1.3K
Pros & Cons
Pros 52 Devops 44 Automate it 26 Reusable components 21 Dynamic and idempotent server configuration 18 Great community Cons 3 Steep learning curve 1 Customs types idempotence	Pros 284 Agentless 210 Great configuration 199 Simple 176 Powerful 155 Easy to learn Cons 8 Dangerous 5 Hard to install 3 Bloated 3 Doesn't Run on Windows 3 Backward compatibility
Integrations
No integrations available	Nexmo Stackdriver VMware vSphere Docker OpenStack Amazon EC2 Rackspace Cloud Servers Google Compute Engine New Relic PagerDuty

What are some alternatives to Puppet Labs, Ansible?

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Mina

Mina works really fast because it's a deploy Bash script generator. It generates an entire procedure as a Bash script and runs it remotely in the server. Compare this to the likes of Vlad or Capistrano, where each command is run separately on their own SSH sessions. Mina only creates one SSH session per deploy, minimizing the SSH connection overhead.

Puppet Bolt

It is an open source orchestration tool that automates the manual work it takes to maintain your infrastructure. Use it to automate tasks that you perform on an as-needed basis or as part of a greater orchestration workflow.

Related Comparisons

Ansible vs Puppet Labs: What are the differences?

Configuration Language: Ansible uses YAML for configuration management, providing a simple and human-readable syntax, while Puppet Labs uses its own domain-specific language that can have a steeper learning curve.
Agentless vs. Agent-based: Ansible operates in an agentless mode, connecting to remote systems via SSH, which simplifies deployment and management. On the other hand, Puppet Labs requires an agent to be installed on each managed node, adding complexity to the infrastructure.
Workflow Automation: Ansible is more focused on task execution and orchestration, allowing for simpler automation of workflows. In contrast, Puppet Labs emphasizes the desired state configuration management approach, ensuring that the system remains in a defined state over time.
Community Support: Ansible has a large and active community that contributes to its vast collection of roles and modules. Puppet Labs, while also having a strong community, may not have as extensive a library of pre-built modules as Ansible.
Ease of Use: Ansible is known for its ease of use and quick setup, making it a popular choice for rapid deployment and configuration tasks. Puppet Labs, with its more complex agent-based architecture, may require more time and effort to set up and maintain.
Scalability: Ansible is well-suited for small to medium-sized infrastructures due to its agentless design and lightweight nature. In comparison, Puppet Labs may be better suited for larger, more complex environments that require strict control over system configurations.

In Summary, Ansible and Puppet Labs differ in configuration language, agent architecture, workflow automation, community support, ease of use, and scalability.

Ansible vs Puppet Labs

Overview