Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ansible

18.9K
15.3K
+ 1
1.3K
Octopus Deploy

400
492
+ 1
118
Add tool

Ansible vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Ansible and Octopus Deploy, highlighting the key differences between the two.

  1. Installation and Architecture: Ansible is a server-agentless configuration management tool, while Octopus Deploy is a server-agent based deployment automation tool. Ansible uses SSH or WinRM to connect to remote servers, while Octopus Deploy requires agents to be installed on target machines. Ansible follows a push-based model, where the controller pushes configurations to the target machines, while Octopus Deploy follows a pull-based model, where agents pull deployments from the Octopus Server.

  2. Supported Platforms: Ansible is platform-agnostic and can be used to manage and configure a wide range of operating systems and platforms. It supports Linux, Unix, macOS, and Windows. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy primarily focuses on deploying applications to Windows servers, with limited support for Linux and macOS.

  3. Configuration Management: Ansible provides a declarative approach to configuration management, where desired states are declared and Ansible takes care of reaching those states. It uses YAML-based playbooks to define tasks and configurations. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, focuses more on deployment management than configuration management. It allows for more flexibility in defining deployment processes and workflows, but lacks the extensive configuration management capabilities of Ansible.

  4. Scalability and Orchestration: Ansible is designed to work at a large scale and supports orchestrating and managing configurations across thousands of servers. It provides advanced features like dynamic inventory, parallel execution, and rolling updates to handle large-scale deployments efficiently. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is more suited for smaller to medium-sized deployments and may not be as scalable as Ansible for large-scale environments.

  5. Integration and Ecosystem: Ansible has a large and active community, with a vast ecosystem of modules, plugins, and integrations available. It can be easily integrated with other DevOps tools and has extensive support for various cloud platforms, containerization technologies, and version control systems. Octopus Deploy has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Ansible, with limited integrations and plugins available.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Ansible is an open-source tool under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and is available for free. It also offers a commercial version, Ansible Tower, with additional features and enterprise support. Octopus Deploy is a commercial tool and follows a subscription-based licensing model. It offers different pricing tiers based on the number of target deployment targets and users.

In summary, Ansible is an agentless configuration management tool with broader platform support, extensive configuration management capabilities, and a larger ecosystem. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is a deployment automation tool with focus on Windows deployments, flexible deployment workflows, and a more limited ecosystem.

Advice on Ansible and Octopus Deploy
Needs advice
on
AnsibleAnsibleChefChef
and
Puppet LabsPuppet Labs

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

See more
Replies (2)
Recommends
on
AnsibleAnsible

I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.

The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.

See more
Gabriel Pa
Recommends
on
KubernetesKubernetes
at

If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Ansible
Pros of Octopus Deploy
  • 284
    Agentless
  • 210
    Great configuration
  • 199
    Simple
  • 176
    Powerful
  • 155
    Easy to learn
  • 69
    Flexible
  • 55
    Doesn't get in the way of getting s--- done
  • 35
    Makes sense
  • 30
    Super efficient and flexible
  • 27
    Powerful
  • 11
    Dynamic Inventory
  • 9
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 7
    Works with AWS
  • 6
    Cloud Oriented
  • 6
    Easy to maintain
  • 4
    Vagrant provisioner
  • 4
    Simple and powerful
  • 4
    Multi language
  • 4
    Simple
  • 4
    Because SSH
  • 4
    Procedural or declarative, or both
  • 4
    Easy
  • 3
    Consistency
  • 2
    Well-documented
  • 2
    Masterless
  • 2
    Debugging is simple
  • 2
    Merge hash to get final configuration similar to hiera
  • 2
    Fast as hell
  • 1
    Manage any OS
  • 1
    Work on windows, but difficult to manage
  • 1
    Certified Content
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
  • 8
    Allows multitenancy
  • 4
    Nice interface

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Ansible
Cons of Octopus Deploy
  • 8
    Dangerous
  • 5
    Hard to install
  • 3
    Doesn't Run on Windows
  • 3
    Bloated
  • 3
    Backward compatibility
  • 2
    No immutable infrastructure
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
  • 2
    Management of Config

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Ansible?

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

What is Octopus Deploy?

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Ansible?
What companies use Octopus Deploy?
See which teams inside your own company are using Ansible or Octopus Deploy.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Ansible?
What tools integrate with Octopus Deploy?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

PythonDockerKubernetes+14
12
2615
GitGitHubSlack+30
27
18410
JavaScriptGitGitHub+33
20
2091
GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
12
6579
JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
53
21948
What are some alternatives to Ansible and Octopus Deploy?
Puppet Labs
Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.
Chef
Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.
Salt
Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.
Terraform
With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
See all alternatives