StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Angular Material vs UIkIt

Angular Material vs UIkIt

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

UIkIt
UIkIt
Stacks791
Followers417
Votes262
GitHub Stars18.5K
Forks2.3K
Angular Material
Angular Material
Stacks624
Followers755
Votes32
GitHub Stars24.9K
Forks6.8K

Angular Material vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

## Angular Material vs UIkit

Angular Material and UIkit are both popular front-end frameworks that offer a variety of components and styles to enhance the visual appeal and functionality of web applications. Below are key differences between Angular Material and UIkit:

1. **Programming Language Support**: Angular Material is specifically built for Angular applications, meaning it provides out-of-the-box support for Angular features such as directives and data binding. On the other hand, UIkit is a more lightweight framework that is not tied to a specific JavaScript framework, making it more versatile for different projects.

2. **Component Availability**: Angular Material offers a comprehensive set of pre-built components such as navigation menus, buttons, and cards that are specifically designed to work seamlessly within Angular applications. In contrast, UIkit provides a more diverse range of components including sliders, lightboxes, and modals, catering to a wider range of design requirements.

3. **Customization Options**: UIkit provides more flexibility in terms of customization, allowing developers to easily tweak styles, colors, and layouts to fit the specific design needs of a project. Angular Material, however, follows Google's Material Design guidelines, which may limit the extent to which components can be customized without deviating from the established design principles.

4. **Community and Documentation**: Angular Material benefits from being maintained by Google and having extensive documentation and community support due to its close ties with the Angular ecosystem. UIkit also has a strong community backing, but may not offer as extensive documentation or resources compared to Angular Material.

5. **Learning Curve**: Due to its integration with Angular, Angular Material may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Angular concepts such as modules, components, and services. UIkit, being a more standalone framework, may be easier for developers to pick up quickly, especially if they are already familiar with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

6. **Themes and Styling**: Angular Material provides a consistent and cohesive design language based on Material Design principles, making it easier to create visually appealing and user-friendly interfaces. UIkit, on the other hand, offers a more modular approach to styling, allowing developers to mix and match different components and styles to create unique design schemes.

In Summary, the choice between Angular Material and UIkit will depend on factors such as project requirements, familiarity with Angular, need for customization, and design preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on UIkIt, Angular Material

Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Sai Karun
Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

UIkIt
UIkIt
Angular Material
Angular Material

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.
Easy to use ; comprehensive & modern UI components ; UI components work across the web, mobile and desktop; material styled angular apps fast and easy
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.5K
GitHub Stars
24.9K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
6.8K
Stacks
791
Stacks
624
Followers
417
Followers
755
Votes
262
Votes
32
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Complete GUI
  • 29
    Easy modify
  • 27
    Practical
  • 24
    Easy to learn
  • 24
    Functional
Pros
  • 12
    Components
  • 8
    Backed by a well known company
  • 4
    Simple
  • 3
    Easy
  • 2
    Very good documentation
Cons
  • 4
    Fairly large
  • 2
    Look like 90s stuffs
  • 2
    Shit
  • 2
    Suck
Integrations
No integrations available
Angular CLI
Angular CLI
Angular
Angular

What are some alternatives to UIkIt, Angular Material ?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase