Android SDK vs UIkIt

Overview

Android SDK

Stacks27.6K

Followers20.7K

Votes800

UIkIt

Stacks791

Followers417

Votes262

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks2.3K

Android SDK vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Introduction

Android SDK and UIKit are both software development frameworks used for building user interfaces in mobile applications. However, they have several key differences that set them apart from each other.

Programming Language: Android SDK uses Java as its primary programming language, whereas UIKit uses Objective-C or Swift. This difference in programming languages can significantly impact the developer's familiarity and expertise required to work with either framework.
Platform Compatibility: Android SDK is specifically designed for Android devices, while UIKit is primarily used for developing iOS applications. This means that Android SDK is not compatible with iOS devices, and UIKit cannot be used to develop applications for Android devices, limiting their respective target platforms.
User Interface Components: Android SDK offers a wide range of user interface components, such as activities, fragments, and views. UIKit, on the other hand, provides its own set of user interface components, including view controllers, tab bars, and navigation bars. These components differ in functionality and appearance, requiring developers to learn and adapt to the specific component set provided by each framework.
Development Environment: Android SDK is typically developed using Android Studio, an integrated development environment (IDE) specifically designed for Android app development. On the other hand, UIKit development is primarily done using Xcode, an IDE exclusively built for iOS and macOS app development. The differences in the development environments can affect the development workflow and efficiency.
App Distribution: Android SDK apps can be distributed through the Google Play Store and other Android-compatible app marketplaces. In contrast, UIKit apps can be distributed through the Apple App Store. These different distribution channels and marketplaces may have their own set of guidelines, requirements, and submission processes, which developers need to be aware of and adhere to.
Backward Compatibility: Android SDK has a wider range of backward compatibility, allowing apps to run on older Android versions, with compatibility adjustments. In contrast, UIKit may have limited backward compatibility, with newer features and functionalities only available on the latest iOS versions. This can affect the target audience and devices that can run apps built using either framework.

In summary, Android SDK and UIKit differ in terms of programming languages, platform compatibility, user interface components, development environments, app distribution, and backward compatibility, making them suitable for different target platforms and requiring distinct skills and knowledge from developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Android SDK, UIkIt

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Omran

CTO & Co-founder at Bonton Connect

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceon

Kotlin

We actually initially wrote a lot of networking code in Kotlin but the complexities involved prompted us to try and compile NodeJS for Android and port over all the networking logic to Node and communicate with node over the Java Native Interface.

This turned out to be a great decision considering our battery usage fell by 40% and rate of development increased by a factor of 2.

622k views622k

Comments

Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Android SDK	UIkIt
Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.	UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.
-	LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 18.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 27.6K	Stacks 791
Followers 20.7K	Followers 417
Votes 800	Votes 262
Pros & Cons
Pros 289 Android development 156 Necessary for android 128 Android studio 86 Mobile framework 82 Backed by google	Pros 39 Complete GUI 29 Easy modify 27 Practical 24 Functional 24 Easy to learn
Integrations
Java	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Android SDK, UIkIt?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Android SDK vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Introduction

Programming Language: Android SDK uses Java as its primary programming language, whereas UIKit uses Objective-C or Swift. This difference in programming languages can significantly impact the developer's familiarity and expertise required to work with either framework.
Platform Compatibility: Android SDK is specifically designed for Android devices, while UIKit is primarily used for developing iOS applications. This means that Android SDK is not compatible with iOS devices, and UIKit cannot be used to develop applications for Android devices, limiting their respective target platforms.
User Interface Components: Android SDK offers a wide range of user interface components, such as activities, fragments, and views. UIKit, on the other hand, provides its own set of user interface components, including view controllers, tab bars, and navigation bars. These components differ in functionality and appearance, requiring developers to learn and adapt to the specific component set provided by each framework.
Development Environment: Android SDK is typically developed using Android Studio, an integrated development environment (IDE) specifically designed for Android app development. On the other hand, UIKit development is primarily done using Xcode, an IDE exclusively built for iOS and macOS app development. The differences in the development environments can affect the development workflow and efficiency.
App Distribution: Android SDK apps can be distributed through the Google Play Store and other Android-compatible app marketplaces. In contrast, UIKit apps can be distributed through the Apple App Store. These different distribution channels and marketplaces may have their own set of guidelines, requirements, and submission processes, which developers need to be aware of and adhere to.
Backward Compatibility: Android SDK has a wider range of backward compatibility, allowing apps to run on older Android versions, with compatibility adjustments. In contrast, UIKit may have limited backward compatibility, with newer features and functionalities only available on the latest iOS versions. This can affect the target audience and devices that can run apps built using either framework.

Android SDK vs UIkIt

Overview