Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Ambassador vs Runscope: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code compares the key differences between Ambassador and Runscope.

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Ambassador primarily focuses on API gateway and Kubernetes integration, providing robust tools for managing API traffic and workload distribution. In contrast, Runscope specializes in API testing and monitoring, ensuring the reliability and performance of APIs by actively monitoring them for potential issues.
2. **Feature Set**: Ambassador offers features like rate limiting, authentication, and routing for API management, catering to the needs of developers and administrators. On the other hand, Runscope provides features such as automated API testing, detailed performance monitoring, and API analytics for comprehensive API quality assurance.
3. **Customization Options**: Ambassador allows users to customize and extend its functionality through plugins and custom configurations, enabling a high level of flexibility in managing API workflows. In contrast, Runscope offers customization options through test scripts and integrations with popular testing frameworks, facilitating in-depth API testing scenarios.
4. **Scalability**: Ambassador is designed to handle high volumes of API traffic and scale dynamically with Kubernetes clusters, ensuring consistent performance under heavy workloads. In comparison, Runscope focuses on providing scalable API testing solutions and monitoring tools to accommodate diverse testing needs across different environments.
5. **User Interface**: Ambassador offers a user-friendly interface with a dashboard for monitoring API traffic, configuring routing rules, and managing access control policies. In contrast, Runscope provides a comprehensive testing dashboard for creating tests, setting up monitors, and analyzing API performance metrics in real-time.
6. **Community Support**: Ambassador has a vibrant community of users and contributors who actively share resources, best practices, and extensions to enhance the platform's capabilities. On the other hand, Runscope offers dedicated customer support services and documentation to assist users in troubleshooting issues and optimizing API testing workflows.

In Summary, the key differences between Ambassador and Runscope lie in their focus on integration capabilities, feature sets, customization options, scalability, user interface design, and community support.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Ambassador
Pros of Runscope
  • 3
  • 1
    Kubernetes friendly configuration
  • 17
    Great features
  • 15
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Nicely priced
  • 4
    Free plan
  • 2
    No install needed - runs on cloud
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
  • 1
    Awesome customer support
  • 1
    Import scripts from sources including Postman
  • 1
    Shareable Collections
  • 1
    Global & Collection level variables
  • 1
    Graphical view of response times historically
  • 1
    Integrations - StatusPage, PagerDuty, HipChat, Victorop
  • 1
    Run tests from multiple locations across globe
  • 1
    Schedule test collections to auto-run at intervals
  • 1
    Auto Re-run failed scheduled tests before notifying
  • 1
    Makes developing REST APIs easy
  • 1
    History feature - call history and response history
  • 1
    Restrict access by teams
  • 1
    Fully featured without looking cluttered
  • 1
    Can save and share scripts

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Ambassador?

Map services to arbitrary URLs in a single, declarative YAML file. Configure routes with CORS support, circuit breakers, timeouts, and more. Replace your Kubernetes ingress controller. Route gRPC, WebSockets, or HTTP.

What is Runscope?

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Ambassador?
What companies use Runscope?
See which teams inside your own company are using Ambassador or Runscope.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Ambassador?
What tools integrate with Runscope?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

DockerSlackAmazon EC2+17
What are some alternatives to Ambassador and Runscope?
Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.
Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.
Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.
JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
See all alternatives