Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon SQS vs Azure Service Bus: What are the differences?
Amazon SQS: Fully managed message queuing service. Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use; Azure Service Bus: *Reliable cloud messaging as a service (MaaS) *. It is a cloud messaging system for connecting apps and devices across public and private clouds. You can depend on it when you need highly-reliable cloud messaging service between applications and services, even when one or more is offline.
Amazon SQS and Azure Service Bus can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools.
According to the StackShare community, Amazon SQS has a broader approval, being mentioned in 497 company stacks & 402 developers stacks; compared to Azure Service Bus, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 8 developer stacks.
Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?
We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).
Thank you very much in advance :)
There are many different messaging frameworks available for IPC use. It's not really a question of how "new" the technology is, but what you need it to do. Azure Service Bus can be a great service to use, but it can also take a lot of effort to administrate and maintain that can make it costly to use unless you need the more advanced features it offers for routing, sequencing, delivery, etc. I would recommend checking out this link to get a basic idea of different messaging architectures. These only cover Azure services, but there are many other solutions that use similar architectural models.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/event-grid/compare-messaging-services
I want to schedule a message. Amazon SQS provides a delay of 15 minutes, but I want it in some hours.
Example: Let's say a Message1 is consumed by a consumer A but somehow it failed inside the consumer. I would want to put it in a queue and retry after 4hrs. Can I do this in Amazon MQ? I have seen in some Amazon MQ videos saying scheduling messages can be done. But, I'm not sure how.
Amazon SQSMithiridi, I believe you are talking about two different things. 1. If you need to process messages with delays of more 15m or at specific times, it's not a good idea to use queues, independently of tool SQM, Rabbit or Amazon MQ. you should considerer another approach using a scheduled job. 2. For dead queues and policy retries RabbitMQ, for example, doesn't support your use case. https://medium.com/@kiennguyen88/rabbitmq-delay-retry-schedule-with-dead-letter-exchange-31fb25a440fc I'm not sure if that is possible SNS/SQS support, they have a maximum delay for delivery (maxDelayTarget) in seconds but it's not clear the number. You can check this out: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sns/latest/dg/sns-message-delivery-retries.html
Pros of Amazon SQS
- Easy to use, reliable60
- Low cost39
- Simple27
- Doesn't need to maintain it13
- It is Serverless8
- Has a max message size (currently 256K)4
- Easy to configure with Terraform3
- Triggers Lambda3
- Delayed delivery upto 15 mins only3
- Delayed delivery upto 12 hours3
- JMS compliant1
- Support for retry and dead letter queue1
- D1
Pros of Azure Service Bus
- Easy Integration with .Net4
- Cloud Native2
- Use while high messaging need1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon SQS
- Has a max message size (currently 256K)2
- Proprietary2
- Difficult to configure2
- Has a maximum 15 minutes of delayed messages only1
Cons of Azure Service Bus
- Observability of messages in the queue is lacking1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Amazon SQS?
What is Azure Service Bus?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Azure Service Bus?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Amazon SQS?
What tools integrate with Azure Service Bus?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+17
+47
+30+26
+23+37+25